Suppr超能文献

用于嗜热链球菌、德氏保加利亚乳杆菌亚种、嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌选择性计数的培养基评估。

Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and bifidobacteria.

作者信息

Dave R I, Shah N P

机构信息

Department of Food Technology, Victoria University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 1996 Sep;79(9):1529-36. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76513-X.

Abstract

Fifteen media were evaluated to determine their suitability for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and bifidobacteria using 5 to 6 strains of each of the four groups of organisms. Streptococcus thermophilus agar was found to be suitable for selective enumeration of S. thermophilus under aerobic incubation at 37 degrees C for 24 h. The MRS agar at pH 5.2 or reinforced clostridial agar at pH 5.3 could be used for the selective enumeration of L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus when the incubation was carried out at 45 degrees C for > or = 72 h. However, the recovery of this organism was lower on MRS agar at pH 5.2 or reinforced clostridial agar at pH 5.3 than that obtained on MRS agar. The recovery of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria on MRS agar and MRS-maltose agar was similar; MRS-maltose agar could be used to enumerate total counts of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria. For selective enumeration of L. acidophilus, MRS-salicin agar or MRS-sorbitol agar could be used. For selective enumeration of bifidobacteria, MRS NNLP (nalidixic acid, neomycin sulfate, lithium chloride, and paromomycin sulfate) agar was suitable; however, determination of bifidobacteria by differential counts between L. acidophilus enumerated on MRS-salicin agar or MRS-sorbitol agar and the total counts of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria obtained from MRS-maltose agar resulted in higher recovery of some strains of bifidobacteria. Other media that were evaluated in this study were not suitable for selective enumeration.

摘要

使用四组微生物中每组5至6个菌株,对15种培养基进行了评估,以确定它们对嗜热链球菌、德氏乳杆菌保加利亚亚种、嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌进行选择性计数的适用性。发现嗜热链球菌琼脂适合在37℃有氧培养24小时的条件下对嗜热链球菌进行选择性计数。当在45℃培养≥72小时时,pH 5.2的MRS琼脂或pH 5.3的强化梭菌琼脂可用于德氏乳杆菌保加利亚亚种的选择性计数。然而,该菌在pH 5.2的MRS琼脂或pH 5.3的强化梭菌琼脂上的回收率低于在MRS琼脂上的回收率。嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌在MRS琼脂和MRS - 麦芽糖琼脂上的回收率相似;MRS - 麦芽糖琼脂可用于嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌总数的计数。对于嗜酸乳杆菌的选择性计数,可使用MRS - 水杨苷琼脂或MRS - 山梨醇琼脂。对于双歧杆菌的选择性计数,MRS NNLP(萘啶酸、硫酸新霉素、氯化锂和硫酸巴龙霉素)琼脂是合适的;然而,通过在MRS - 水杨苷琼脂或MRS - 山梨醇琼脂上计数嗜酸乳杆菌与从MRS - 麦芽糖琼脂获得的嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌总数之间的差异来确定双歧杆菌,可使一些双歧杆菌菌株的回收率更高。本研究中评估的其他培养基不适合进行选择性计数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验