Toffoli G, Sorio R, Gigante M, Corona G, Galligioni E, Boiocchi M
Department of Experimental Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano (PN), Italy.
Br J Cancer. 1997;75(5):715-21. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.127.
Patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were enrolled in a phase II study with teniposide (VM26) and cyclosporin A (CSA) to investigate (1) the effect of CSA on the response rate to VM26; and (2) the effect of CSA on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VM26. Sixteen patients initially received VM26 alone (200 mg m(-2) day(-1) i.v.). No objective responses were observed and all patients crossed over to receive at least an additional two courses (range 2-5) of VM26 plus CSA (5 mg kg(-1) 2h(-1) followed by 30 mg kg(-1) 48h(-1) i.v.). At the end of the 2-h loading dose of CSA, whole-blood CSA levels ranged from 2250 to 3830 ng ml(-1), whereas at the end of the 48-h CSA infusion, CSA ranged from 1830 to 4501 ng ml(-1). CSA significantly (P<0.01) increased the area under the curve (AUC) of VM26. The variation in the paired AUC of VM26 was 50%. Terminal half-life of VM26 was significantly (P<0.01) increased (1.72-fold) after CSA administration, whereas the systemic clearance of VM26 was decreased by 1.4-fold (P<0.01). The nadir neutrophil count after VM26 plus CSA (median 700 microl(-1), range <100 to 2860 microl(-1)) was lower than after VM26 alone (median 1900 microl(-1), range 200 to 6000 microl(-1)). Increased haematological toxicity after CSA could be explained by the increase in the VM26 AUC and by inhibition of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity in haematopoietic precursor cells. Bilirubin concentrations in the serum were increased after VM26 plus CSA compared with VM26 alone (P<0.01). Among the 15 patients evaluable for response, one had a minor response, eight had stable disease, and six had progressive disease. In conclusion, the dose of CSA we used achieved plasma concentrations within the effective range for P-gp inhibition. CSA affected both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of VM26 in the patients, principally by increasing the plasma concentrations of the antineoplastic drug and VM26 haemopoietic toxicity.
难治性转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者参加了一项使用替尼泊苷(VM26)和环孢素A(CSA)的II期研究,以调查:(1)CSA对VM26缓解率的影响;以及(2)CSA对VM26药代动力学和药效学的影响。16例患者最初单独接受VM26(200mg m⁻² 每日静脉注射)。未观察到客观缓解,所有患者交叉接受至少另外两个疗程(范围2 - 5个疗程)的VM26加CSA(5mg kg⁻¹ 每2小时一次,随后30mg kg⁻¹ 每48小时一次静脉注射)。在CSA 2小时负荷剂量结束时,全血CSA水平范围为2250至3830ng/ml,而在48小时CSA输注结束时,CSA范围为1830至4501ng/ml。CSA显著(P<0.01)增加了VM26的曲线下面积(AUC)。VM26配对AUC的变化为50%。CSA给药后,VM26的终末半衰期显著(P<0.01)延长(1.72倍),而VM26的全身清除率降低了1.4倍(P<0.01)。VM26加CSA后的中性粒细胞计数最低点(中位数700μl⁻¹,范围<100至2860μl⁻¹)低于单独使用VM26后(中位数1900μl⁻¹,范围200至6000μl⁻¹)。CSA后血液学毒性增加可通过VM26 AUC增加以及造血前体细胞中P-糖蛋白(P-gp)活性受抑制来解释。与单独使用VM26相比,VM26加CSA后血清胆红素浓度升高(P<0.01)。在15例可评估缓解的患者中,1例有轻微缓解,8例病情稳定,6例病情进展。总之,我们使用的CSA剂量达到了抑制P-gp的有效血浆浓度范围。CSA影响了患者体内VM26的药代动力学和药效学,主要是通过增加抗肿瘤药物的血浆浓度以及VM26的造血毒性。