Bisgaard H
Department of Pediatrics, National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl. 1997 Sep;15:27-33.
Inhaled corticosteroids reduce asthma symptoms and exacerbations, improve lung function, and reduce airway inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity more effectively than other treatments. However, inhaled corticosteroids may be unable to return lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity to normal when introduced for moderately severe asthma. This finding highlights the need to improve treatment strategy in pediatric asthma. The natural progression of persistent asthma may lead to loss of lung function and chronic bronchial hyperreactivity for children and adults. There is evidence to suggest that asthma acts via a chronic inflammatory process that causes remodeling of the airways with mucosal thickening and smooth muscle hypertrophy. An optimal treatment strategy would be one aimed at reducing the ongoing airway inflammation. Inhaled steroids ameliorate the inflammation, whereas this has not been documented for any other treatment. Delayed introduction of inhaled steroids appears to result in reduced improvement in lung function compared with the early use of inhaled steroids. This improved response from the earlier use of inhaled steroids appears to be valid at any stage of the disease. Therefore, a change in treatment strategy toward earlier introduction of corticosteroids may impede airway remodeling, bronchial hyperreactivity, and airway damage. No other treatment has been found to affect the course of the disease. Systemic side-effects, particularly inhibition of growth in asthmatic children using inhaled corticosteroids, do not seem to be cause for concern. Growth retardation has not been reported when inhaled corticosteroid doses of < or = 400 micrograms daily are individually tailored to each child's needs. The ongoing change in treatment strategy toward the earlier use of inhaled steroids in childhood asthma, as reflected in current revisions of various treatment strategies, therefore seems well founded.
吸入性糖皮质激素比其他治疗方法更有效地减轻哮喘症状和发作,改善肺功能,并减轻气道炎症和支气管高反应性。然而,对于中度至重度哮喘患者,引入吸入性糖皮质激素后可能无法使肺功能和支气管高反应性恢复正常。这一发现凸显了改进儿童哮喘治疗策略的必要性。持续性哮喘的自然进展可能导致儿童和成人肺功能丧失以及慢性支气管高反应性。有证据表明,哮喘是通过慢性炎症过程起作用的,该过程会导致气道重塑,伴有黏膜增厚和平滑肌肥大。最佳的治疗策略应该是旨在减轻持续的气道炎症。吸入性类固醇可减轻炎症,而其他任何治疗方法均未证实有此作用。与早期使用吸入性类固醇相比,延迟使用似乎会导致肺功能改善程度降低。在疾病的任何阶段,早期使用吸入性类固醇带来的这种更好的反应似乎都是有效的。因此,将治疗策略转变为更早引入糖皮质激素可能会阻碍气道重塑、支气管高反应性和气道损伤。尚未发现其他治疗方法会影响疾病进程。全身副作用,特别是使用吸入性糖皮质激素的哮喘儿童生长受到抑制,似乎无需担忧。当根据每个儿童的需求将吸入性糖皮质激素剂量调整为每日≤400微克时,尚未有生长发育迟缓的报告。因此,目前各种治疗策略修订版所反映的儿童哮喘治疗策略向更早使用吸入性类固醇的持续转变似乎有充分依据。