Moon D H, Maddahi J, Silverman D H, Glaspy J A, Phelps M E, Hoh C K
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90095-6942, USA.
J Nucl Med. 1998 Mar;39(3):431-5.
This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body PET on a patient and lesion basis using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the detection of tumor foci in patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma.
Whole-body FDG-PET imaging was performed on 57 patients with a previous history of breast carcinoma who were referred for a clinical suspicion of disease recurrence. Whole-body PET images were scored from 1 (definitely negative) to 5 (definitely positive) by three independent observers, and discrepancies were resolved by a fourth observer. Patients were clinically followed for up to 24 mo to assess the accuracy of PET diagnosis by biopsy, follow-up imaging and other diagnostic tests.
PET scans showed that there were 41 sites indicating recurrent or metastatic disease in 29 patients. There were 38 sites in 28 patients that showed no evidence for malignant disease. On a patient basis, with scores 4 or 5 considered to be positive, sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 79%, respectively. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 82% and 92%. On a lesion basis, with scores 4 or 5 considered to be positive, the sensitivity was 85% and specificity 79%. The area index in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.91 for patient-based analysis and 0.88 for lesion-based analysis. To determine the cause for false-negative and false-positive findings more precisely, false-negative lesions with scores of 3 or lower and false-positive lesions with scores of 4 or higher were analyzed. Bone metastases had a significantly larger proportion of false-negative lesions than other nonosseous malignant sites (p < 0.05). False-positive lesions were due to muscle uptake (n = 5), inflammation (n = 4), blood pool activity in the great vessels (n = 2), bowel uptake (n = 1) and unknown causes (n = 6).
The whole-body FDG-PET scan is a useful diagnostic test for detecting recurrent or metastatic lesions of breast carcinoma. However, the sensitivity for metastases to bone appears to be lower than that to other organs. Specificity may be improved by more strict attention to patient preparation and better recognition of physiologic skeletal muscle or artifactual uptakes.
本研究使用18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG),基于患者和病灶评估全身PET对乳腺癌疑似复发或转移病灶患者肿瘤灶检测的诊断准确性。
对57例有乳腺癌病史且因临床怀疑疾病复发而转诊的患者进行全身FDG-PET成像。由三名独立观察者对全身PET图像从1分(肯定为阴性)到5分(肯定为阳性)进行评分,分歧由第四名观察者解决。对患者进行长达24个月的临床随访,以通过活检、随访成像和其他诊断测试评估PET诊断的准确性。
PET扫描显示,29例患者中有41个部位提示复发或转移性疾病。28例患者中有38个部位未显示恶性疾病证据。基于患者,将4分或5分视为阳性,敏感性和特异性分别为93%和79%。相应的阳性和阴性预测值分别为82%和92%。基于病灶,将4分或5分视为阳性,敏感性为85%,特异性为79%。受试者操作特征分析中的面积指数,基于患者的分析为0.91,基于病灶的分析为0.88。为更精确地确定假阴性和假阳性结果的原因,分析了评分为3分或更低的假阴性病灶和评分为4分或更高的假阳性病灶。骨转移的假阴性病灶比例明显高于其他非骨性恶性部位(p<0.05)。假阳性病灶是由于肌肉摄取(n=5)、炎症(n=4)、大血管血池活性(n=2)、肠道摄取(n=1)和不明原因(n=6)。
全身FDG-PET扫描是检测乳腺癌复发或转移病灶的有用诊断测试。然而,对骨转移的敏感性似乎低于对其他器官的敏感性。通过更严格地关注患者准备以及更好地识别生理性骨骼肌或伪影摄取,可提高特异性。