Drost J B, Lee W R
Institute for Mutagenesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803-1754, USA.
Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):421-43.
Data involving germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster and mouse are reconciled with developmental observations. Mutations that become fixed in the early embryo before separation of soma from the germline may, by the sampling process of development, continue as part of germline and/or differentiate into any somatic tissue. The cuticle of adult D. melanogaster, because of segmental development, can be used to estimate the proportion of mutant nuclei in the early embryo, but most somatic tissues and the germlines of both species continue from samples too small to be representative of the early embryo. Because of the small sample of cells/nuclei that remain in the germline after separation of soma in both species, mosaic germlines have percentages of mutant cells that vary widely, with a mean of 50% and an unusual platykurtic, flat-topped distribution. While the sampling process leads to similar statistical results for both species, their patterns of development are very different. In D. melanogaster the first differentiation is the separation of soma from germline with the germline continuing from a sample of only two to four nuclei, whereas the adult cuticle is a representative sample of cleavage nuclei. The presence of mosaicism in D. melanogaster germline is independent of mosaicism in the eye, head, and thorax. This independence was used to determine that mutations can occur at any of the early embryonic cell divisions and still average 50% mutant germ cells when the germline is mosaic; however, the later the mutation occurs, the higher the proportion of completely nonmutant germlines. In contrast to D. melanogaster, the first differentiation in the mouse does not separate soma from germline but produces the inner cell mass that is representative of the cleavage nuclei. Following formation of the primitive streak, the primordial germ cells develop at the base of the allantois and among a clonally related sample of cells, providing the same statistical distribution in the mouse germlines as in D. melanogaster. The proportion of mutations that are fixed during early embryonic development is greatly underestimated. For example, a DNA lesion in a postmeiotic gamete that becomes fixed as a dominant mutation during early embryonic development of the F1 may produce an individual completely mutant in the germ line and relevant somatic tissue or, alternatively, the F1 germline may be completely mutant but with no relevant somatic tissues for detecting the mutation until the F2. In both cases the mutation would be classified as complete in the F1 and F2, respectively, and not recognized as embryonic in origin. Because germ cells differentiate later in mammalian development, there are more opportunities for correlation between germline and soma in the mammal than Drosophila. However, because the germ cells and any somatic tissue, like blood, are derived from small samples, there may be many individuals that test negative in blood but have germlines that are either mosaic or entirely mutant.
涉及黑腹果蝇和小鼠种系嵌合体的数据与发育观察结果相符。在体细胞与种系分离之前在早期胚胎中固定下来的突变,可能会通过发育的抽样过程,继续作为种系的一部分和/或分化为任何体细胞组织。成年黑腹果蝇的表皮由于节段发育,可以用来估计早期胚胎中突变细胞核的比例,但大多数体细胞组织以及这两个物种的种系都来自太小而无法代表早期胚胎的样本。由于在这两个物种中体细胞分离后留在种系中的细胞/细胞核样本很小,嵌合种系中突变细胞的百分比差异很大,平均为50%,并且具有不寻常的低峰态、平顶分布。虽然抽样过程导致这两个物种的统计结果相似,但它们的发育模式非常不同。在黑腹果蝇中,第一次分化是体细胞与种系的分离,种系仅从两到四个细胞核的样本中延续,而成年表皮是卵裂细胞核的代表性样本。黑腹果蝇种系中嵌合体的存在与眼睛、头部和胸部的嵌合体无关。这种独立性被用来确定突变可以发生在任何早期胚胎细胞分裂中,并且当种系是嵌合体时,突变生殖细胞的平均比例仍为50%;然而,突变发生得越晚,完全无突变种系的比例就越高。与黑腹果蝇不同,小鼠的第一次分化不是将体细胞与种系分离,而是产生代表卵裂细胞核的内细胞团。在原条形成后,原始生殖细胞在尿囊基部和一群克隆相关的细胞中发育,在小鼠种系中提供与黑腹果蝇相同的统计分布。在早期胚胎发育过程中固定下来的突变比例被大大低估了。例如,减数分裂后配子中的DNA损伤在F1的早期胚胎发育过程中作为显性突变固定下来,可能会产生一个在种系和相关体细胞组织中完全突变的个体,或者,F1种系可能完全突变,但在F2之前没有相关体细胞组织来检测突变。在这两种情况下,突变在F1和F2中分别被归类为完全突变,而不会被认为是起源于胚胎的。因为生殖细胞在哺乳动物发育后期才分化,所以哺乳动物中种系和体细胞之间的相关性机会比果蝇更多。然而,由于生殖细胞和任何体细胞组织,如血液,都来自小样本,可能有许多个体在血液检测中呈阴性,但种系要么是嵌合的,要么完全是突变的。