Suppr超能文献

侵入性医疗操作的辅助非药物镇痛:一项随机试验。

Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial.

作者信息

Lang E V, Benotsch E G, Fick L J, Lutgendorf S, Berbaum M L, Berbaum K S, Logan H, Spiegel D

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2000 Apr 29;355(9214):1486-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02162-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacological behavioural adjuncts have been suggested as efficient safe means in reducing discomfort and adverse effects during medical procedures. We tested this assumption for patients undergoing percutaneous vascular and renal procedures in a prospective, randomised, single-centre study.

METHODS

241 patients were randomised to receive intraoperatively standard care (n=79), structured attention (n=80), or self-hypnotic relaxation (n=82). All had access to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with fentanyl and midazolam. Patients rated their pain and anxiety on 0-10 scales before, every 15 min during and after the procedures.

FINDINGS

Pain increased linearly with procedure time in the standard group (slope 0.09 in pain score/15 min, p<0.0001), and the attention group (slope 0.04/15 min; p=0.0425), but remained flat in the hypnosis group. Anxiety decreased over time in all three groups with slopes of -0.04 (standard), -0.07 (attention), and -0.11 (hypnosis). Drug use in the standard group (1.9 units) was significantly higher than in the attention and hypnosis groups (0.8 and 0.9 units, respectively). One hypnosis patient became haemodynamically unstable compared with ten attention patients (p=0.0041), and 12 standard patients (p=0.0009). Procedure times were significantly shorter in the hypnosis group (61 min) than in the standard group (78 min, p=0.0016) with procedure duration of the attention group in between (67 min).

INTERPRETATION

Structured attention and self-hypnotic relaxation proved beneficial during invasive medical procedures. Hypnosis had more pronounced effects on pain and anxiety reduction, and is superior, in that it also improves haemodynamic stability.

摘要

背景

非药物行为辅助方法被认为是减少医疗程序中不适和不良反应的有效且安全的手段。我们在一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究中,对接受经皮血管和肾脏手术的患者验证了这一假设。

方法

241名患者被随机分组,分别接受术中标准护理(n = 79)、结构化关注(n = 80)或自我催眠放松(n = 82)。所有患者均可使用芬太尼和咪达唑仑的患者自控静脉镇痛。患者在手术前、手术期间及术后每15分钟,以0 - 10分的量表对疼痛和焦虑进行评分。

研究结果

标准护理组的疼痛随手术时间呈线性增加(疼痛评分斜率为0.09/15分钟,p < 0.0001),关注组也是如此(斜率为0.04/15分钟;p = 0.0425),但催眠组的疼痛评分保持平稳。所有三组的焦虑水平均随时间下降,标准护理组斜率为 - 0.04,关注组为 - 0.07,催眠组为 - 0.11。标准护理组的药物使用量(1.9单位)显著高于关注组和催眠组(分别为0.8和0.9单位)。与10名接受结构化关注的患者(p = 0.0041)和12名接受标准护理的患者(p = 0.0009)相比,有1名接受自我催眠放松的患者出现血流动力学不稳定。催眠组的手术时间(61分钟)显著短于标准护理组(78分钟,p = 0.0016),关注组的手术时长介于两者之间(67分钟)。

解读

结构化关注和自我催眠放松在侵入性医疗程序中被证明是有益的。催眠对减轻疼痛和焦虑有更显著的效果,而且更具优势,因为它还能改善血流动力学稳定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验