Schatz Desmond, Cuthbertson David, Atkinson Mark, Salzler Michael Clare, Winter William, Muir Andrew, Silverstein Janet, Cook Roberta, Maclaren Noel, She Jin-Xiong, Greenbaum Carla, Krischer Jeffrey
Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610, USA.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2004 Jun;5(2):72-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2004.00047.x.
Individuals at high risk of developing type 1 diabetes mellitus can be identified using immunologic, genetic, and metabolic parameters. In the Diabetes Prevention Trial-1 (DPT-1), annual intravenous infusions of low doses of regular insulin, together with daily subcutaneous injection of a single low dose of Ultralente insulin at nighttime, failed to prevent or delay the onset of type 1 diabetes in high-risk non-diabetic relatives. In our study, we attempted to achieve beta-cell rest by administering higher doses of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin twice daily to high-risk non-diabetic subjects in an effort to prevent or delay the onset of the disease. The maximum tolerable dose was given with the dose reduced for any hypoglycemia (mean dose 0.33 +/- 0.15; range 0.09-0.66 units/kg/d). We treated 26 subjects who were confirmed to have islet cell antibodies (ICAs) and a low first-phase insulin response (FPIR) to intravenous glucose. Fourteen had normal glucose tolerance and 12 impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). The median duration of follow-up was 5.5 yr. Diabetes occurred in 10 of 12 subjects with IGT and five of 14 subjects with normal glucose tolerance. The cumulative incidence of diabetes was the same as with that seen in a matched, observation group (subjects followed prospectively as part of the University of Florida natural history studies) (age, sex, ICA, insulin autoantibodies, duration of ICA prior to enrollment, FPIR, and glucose intolerance; p = 0.39), as was the rate of progression (p = 0.79). There was a higher rate of progression to diabetes in the group with abnormal glucose tolerance at baseline than in those with normal baseline glucose tolerance (p = 0.003). Interestingly, in non-progressors, as opposed to progressors, there was no fall in C-peptide (peak and area under the curve) production regardless of the type of tolerance testing (mixed meal, oral or intravenous) over time (p < 0.001). In this study, in the dose and regimen of NPH insulin used, insulin did not delay or prevent the development of type 1 diabetes. However, preservation of C-peptide production in the prediabetic period appears to indicate non-progression to clinical disease and may serve as a new surrogate for determining response to preventative efforts.
可利用免疫学、遗传学和代谢参数来识别有患1型糖尿病高风险的个体。在糖尿病预防试验-1(DPT-1)中,每年静脉输注低剂量的正规胰岛素,同时每晚皮下注射单一低剂量的超长效胰岛素,未能预防或延缓高危非糖尿病亲属发生1型糖尿病。在我们的研究中,我们试图通过每天给高危非糖尿病受试者两次注射更高剂量的中性鱼精蛋白锌(NPH)胰岛素来实现β细胞休息,以预防或延缓疾病的发生。给予最大耐受剂量,若出现低血糖则减少剂量(平均剂量0.33±0.15;范围0.09 - 0.66单位/千克/天)。我们治疗了26名经确认有胰岛细胞抗体(ICA)且对静脉注射葡萄糖的第一相胰岛素反应(FPIR)较低的受试者。其中14人葡萄糖耐量正常,12人葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT)。随访的中位时间为5.5年。12名IGT受试者中有10人发生糖尿病,14名葡萄糖耐量正常的受试者中有5人发生糖尿病。糖尿病的累积发病率与匹配的观察组(作为佛罗里达大学自然史研究一部分进行前瞻性随访的受试者)(年龄、性别、ICA、胰岛素自身抗体、入组前ICA持续时间、FPIR和葡萄糖不耐受情况)相同(p = 0.39),进展率也相同(p = 0.79)。基线葡萄糖耐量异常组向糖尿病进展的速率高于基线葡萄糖耐量正常组(p = 0.003)。有趣的是,与进展者相反,在非进展者中,无论进行何种类型的耐量试验(混合餐、口服或静脉注射),随着时间推移C肽(峰值和曲线下面积)的产生均未下降(p < 0.001)。在本研究中,就所用NPH胰岛素的剂量和方案而言,胰岛素并未延缓或预防1型糖尿病的发生。然而,在糖尿病前期C肽产生的保留似乎表明不会进展为临床疾病,并且可能作为确定预防措施反应性的一个新的替代指标。