Ohldin Andrea, Young Bessie, Derleth Ann, McDonell Mary, Diehr Paula, Kiefe Catarina, Fihn Stephan
Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center AL, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Jun;96(6):799-808.
To assess differences in self-reported health status and satisfaction between African-American and caucasian veterans with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: African-American and caucasian patients enrolled in General Internal Medicine clinics at six Veteran Affairs Medical Centers.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline survey data from the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Patients who responded to an initial health-screening questionnaire were sent follow-up surveys, which included the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), the Seattle Outpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire (SOSQ), and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).
Of the 44,965 patients approached, 27,977 (62%) returned the baseline survey, of which 10,385 patients reported IHD and were sent the SAQ. Of those, 7,985 patients (84% caucasian, 16% African-American) responded. Caucasian respondents tended to be older, married, nonsmokers, with annual incomes over dollar 10,000, and had higher educational attainment than African Americans. African-American patients reported significantly fewer cardiac procedures (33% vs. 52%, p < 0.001) but were more likely to have diabetes (37% vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and hypertension (81% vs. 68%, p < 0.001). After adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, clinic site, and site-ethnicity interactions, SF-36 scores for physical function, role physical, bodily pain, and vitality were greater for African Americans than caucasians, while adjusted scores were significantly lower for role emotional. However, because of the site-ethnicity interaction, scores varied significantly by site. For the SAQ, overall adjusted physical function summary scores and disease stability scores were significantly greater for African Americans than caucasians. Adjusted summary satisfaction scores for provider satisfaction were not significantly lower for African Americans overall but were significant at two of six sites. Similarly, on the SAQ, adjusted treatment satisfaction scores were significantly lower for African Americans at half of the sites and minimally but not clinically significant overall.
Despite a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors, African-American patients with CAD who were treated in the VA system appeared to have a greater level of physical functioning, vitality, and angina stability. After adjustment for confounding demographic variables, however, these differences were not consistently significant at all geographic locations. This suggests that many other sociodemographic variables, in addition to ethnicity, influence apparent discrepancies in quality of life, satisfaction, and angina.
评估患有缺血性心脏病(IHD)的非裔美国退伍军人与白人退伍军人在自我报告的健康状况和满意度方面的差异。
数据来源/研究背景:在六个退伍军人事务医疗中心的普通内科诊所登记的非裔美国人和白人患者。
我们对门诊护理质量改进项目(ACQUIP)的基线调查数据进行了横断面分析。对初始健康筛查问卷做出回应的患者收到了后续调查问卷,其中包括医学结果研究36项健康调查(SF - 36)、西雅图门诊患者满意度问卷(SOSQ)和西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)。
在44965名被邀请的患者中,27977名(62%)返回了基线调查问卷,其中10385名患者报告患有IHD并收到了SAQ。在这些患者中,7985名患者(84%为白人,16%为非裔美国人)做出了回应。白人受访者往往年龄更大、已婚、不吸烟、年收入超过10000美元,且受教育程度高于非裔美国人。非裔美国患者报告的心脏手术显著较少(33%对52%,p < 0.001),但更有可能患有糖尿病(37%对28%,p < 0.001)和高血压(81%对68%,p < 0.001)。在对人口统计学特征、合并症、诊所地点和地点 - 种族相互作用进行调整后,非裔美国人在身体功能、角色身体、身体疼痛和活力方面的SF - 36得分高于白人,而在角色情感方面的调整得分显著较低。然而,由于地点 - 种族相互作用,得分在不同地点差异显著。对于SAQ,非裔美国人的总体调整后身体功能总结得分和疾病稳定性得分显著高于白人。非裔美国人总体上提供者满意度的调整后总结得分并不显著低于白人,但在六个地点中的两个地点显著较低。同样,在SAQ上,非裔美国人在一半的地点调整后的治疗满意度得分显著较低,总体上虽有差异但无临床意义。
尽管心脏危险因素的患病率较高,但在退伍军人事务系统接受治疗的患有冠心病的非裔美国患者似乎身体功能、活力和心绞痛稳定性水平更高。然而,在对混杂的人口统计学变量进行调整后,这些差异在所有地理位置并不一致显著。这表明除了种族之外,许多其他社会人口统计学变量也会影响生活质量、满意度和心绞痛方面明显的差异。