Srivastava R K, Jozewicz W
Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Dec;51(12):1676-88. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464387.
Coal-fired electricity-generating plants may use SO2 scrubbers to meet the requirements of Phase II of the Acid Rain SO2 Reduction Program. Additionally, the use of scrubbers can result in reduction of Hg and other emissions from combustion sources. It is timely, therefore, to examine the current status of SO2 scrubbing technologies. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state of the art in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies for coal-fired boilers. Data on worldwide FGD applications reveal that wet FGD technologies, and specifically wet limestone FGD, have been predominantly selected over other FGD technologies. However, lime spray drying (LSD) is being used at the majority of the plants employing dry FGD technologies. Additional review of the U.S. FGD technology applications that began operation in 1991 through 1995 reveals that FGD processes of choice recently in the United States have been wet limestone FGD, magnesium-enhanced lime (MEL), and LSD. Further, of the wet limestone processes, limestone forced oxidation (LSFO) has been used most often in recent applications. The SO2 removal performance of scrubbers has been reviewed. Data reflect that most wet limestone and LSD installations appear to be capable of approximately 90% SO2 removal. Advanced, state-of-the-art wet scrubbers can provide SO2 removal in excess of 95%. Costs associated with state-of-the-art applications of LSFO, MEL, and LSD technologies have been analyzed with appropriate cost models. Analyses indicate that the capital cost of an LSD system is lower than those of same capacity LSFO and MEL systems, reflective of the relatively less complex hardware used in LSD. Analyses also reflect that, based on total annualized cost and SO2 removal requirements: (1) plants up to approximately 250 MWe in size and firing low- to medium-sulfur coals (i.e., coals with a sulfur content of 2% or lower) may use LSD; and (2) plants larger than 250 MWe and firing medium- to high-sulfur coals (i.e., coals with a sulfur content of 2% or higher) may use either LSFO or MEL.
燃煤发电厂可能会使用二氧化硫洗涤器来满足酸雨二氧化硫减排计划第二阶段的要求。此外,使用洗涤器可以减少汞及其他燃烧源的排放。因此,审视二氧化硫洗涤技术的当前状况很及时。本文全面综述了燃煤锅炉烟气脱硫(FGD)技术的发展现状。全球FGD应用数据显示,湿法FGD技术,特别是湿式石灰石FGD,已被广泛选用,优于其他FGD技术。然而,在大多数采用干法FGD技术的工厂中使用的是石灰喷雾干燥(LSD)法。对1991年至1995年开始运行的美国FGD技术应用的进一步综述表明,美国近期选用的FGD工艺是湿式石灰石FGD、镁增强石灰(MEL)和LSD。此外,在湿式石灰石工艺中,石灰石强制氧化(LSFO)在近期应用中使用最为频繁。已对洗涤器的二氧化硫去除性能进行了综述。数据表明,大多数湿式石灰石和LSD装置似乎能够去除约90%的二氧化硫。先进的、最先进的湿式洗涤器可实现超过95%的二氧化硫去除率。已使用适当的成本模型分析了与LSFO、MEL和LSD技术的最先进应用相关的成本。分析表明,LSD系统的资本成本低于相同容量的LSFO和MEL系统,这反映了LSD中使用的硬件相对不那么复杂。分析还表明,基于年度总成本和二氧化硫去除要求:(1)规模约250兆瓦及以下且燃烧低硫至中硫煤(即硫含量为2%或更低的煤)的电厂可使用LSD;(2)规模大于250兆瓦且燃烧中硫至高硫煤(即硫含量为2%或更高的煤)的电厂可使用LSFO或MEL。