Suppr超能文献

经支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)确诊的呼吸机相关性肺炎的早期抗生素治疗:常规气管内吸出物培养的作用

Early antibiotic treatment for BAL-confirmed ventilator-associated pneumonia: a role for routine endotracheal aspirate cultures.

作者信息

Michel Fabrice, Franceschini Bruno, Berger Pierre, Arnal Jean-Michel, Gainnier Marc, Sainty Jean-Marie, Papazian Laurent

机构信息

Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 13274 Marseille Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Chest. 2005 Feb;127(2):589-97. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.2.589.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To test whether routine quantitative cultures of endotracheal aspirates obtained before the onset of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) could help to predict the causative microorganisms and to select early appropriate antimicrobial therapy before obtaining BAL culture results.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

French medical ICU.

PATIENTS

A total of 299 patients received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h.

INTERVENTIONS

Endotracheal aspiration (EA) was performed twice weekly in all mechanically ventilated patients. A diagnosis of VAP was made by BAL culture. Only the EA performed just before the suspicion of VAP (EA-pre) were evaluated. This strategy (ie, the EA-pre-based strategy) was compared with an antibiotic therapy that would have been prescribed if the recommendations of both the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Trouillet et al (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157:531-539) had been applied.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

VAP was diagnosed (by BAL culture) in 41 of the 75 patients in whom BAL was performed. Among the 41 BAL specimens that were positive for VAP, EA-pre had identified the same microorganisms (with the same antibiotic resistance patterns) in 34 cases (83%). In one case, EA-pre was not available at the time BAL was performed (a case of early-onset VAP), but the empiric antibiotic therapy was adequate. While EA-pre did not give the same results as the BAL culture, the antibiotic therapy based on the results of the EA-pre was adequate in four other cases. Finally, antibiotic therapy was delayed in only two cases. Antibiotic treatment was therefore adequate in 38 of the 40 assessable cases (95%). If the Trouillet-based strategy had been used, the antibiotic treatment would have been adequate in 34 of the 41 cases (83%; p = 0.15 [vs EA-pre strategy]). Based on the ATS classification, the antibiotic treatment would have been adequately prescribed in only 28 of the 41 cases (68%; p = 0.005 [vs EA-pre strategy]).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine EA performed twice a week makes it possible to prescribe adequate antibiotic therapy (while waiting for BAL culture results) in 95% of the patients in whom a VAP is ultimately diagnosed by BAL culture.

摘要

研究目的

检测在呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发作前获取的气管内吸出物的常规定量培养是否有助于预测致病微生物,并在获得支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)培养结果之前选择早期合适的抗菌治疗。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

法国医疗重症监护病房。

患者

共有299例患者接受机械通气至少48小时。

干预措施

所有机械通气患者每周进行两次气管内抽吸(EA)。通过BAL培养诊断VAP。仅评估在怀疑VAP之前进行的EA(EA-pre)。将该策略(即基于EA-pre的策略)与如果应用美国胸科学会(ATS)和Trouillet等人(《美国呼吸与危重症医学杂志》1998年;157:531 - 539)的建议所开具的抗生素治疗进行比较。

测量与结果

在进行BAL的75例患者中,41例被诊断为VAP(通过BAL培养)。在41例VAP阳性的BAL标本中,EA-pre在34例(83%)中鉴定出相同的微生物(具有相同的抗生素耐药模式)。有1例在进行BAL时无法获得EA-pre(早发性VAP病例),但经验性抗生素治疗是充分的。虽然EA-pre与BAL培养结果不同,但基于EA-pre结果的抗生素治疗在另外4例中是充分的。最后,仅2例抗生素治疗延迟。因此,在40例可评估病例中的38例(95%)抗生素治疗是充分的。如果采用基于Trouillet的策略,在41例病例中的34例(83%)抗生素治疗将是充分的(p = 0.15[与EA-pre策略相比])。根据ATS分类,在41例病例中只有28例(68%)抗生素治疗开具恰当(p = 0.005[与EA-pre策略相比])。

结论

每周进行两次常规EA能够在最终通过BAL培养诊断为VAP的患者中,95%的患者在等待BAL培养结果期间开具充分的抗生素治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验