Suppr超能文献

在地中海地区使用基于甲酸的处理方法控制狄斯瓦螨。

Formic acid-based treatments for control of Varroa destructor in a Mediterranean area.

作者信息

Satta Alberto, Floris Ignazio, Eguaras Martin, Cabras Paolo, Garau Vincenzo Luigi, Melis Marinella

机构信息

Dipartimento di Protezione delle Piante, Sezione di Entomologia Agraria, University of Sassari, Via E. De Nicola 07100, Sassari, Italy.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2005 Apr;98(2):267-73. doi: 10.1093/jee/98.2.267.

Abstract

Two formic acid autumnal treatments, gel packets (BeeVar formulation) and impregnated paperwick (Liebig-Dispenser), were tested in apiary to evaluate their effectiveness against Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman and their residues in honey in a Mediterranean region (Sardinia, Italy). Both treatments were efficient in the apiary control of the varroosis, with values of percentage of mite mortality ranging between 93.6 and 100%, without statistical differences between them. The more gradual release of formic acid from the gel application allowed a longer action (2 wk for each treatment) compared with the Liebig-Dispenser (approximately 3d for each treatment). The rate of daily evaporation ranged between approximately 5 and 9 g/d from BeeVar and approximately 26 and 35 g/d from the Liebig-Dispenser, in the first and second treatment, respectively. The total amount of formic acid administered per hive during all the treatment period was approximately 200 g for either treatment. A significantly higher adult bee mortality was recorded in the Liebig-Dispenser-treated hives compared with the BeeVar-treated group. On the contrary, BeeVar treatment produced an interruption of brood reared, whereas the extension of the sealed brood area of the Liebig-Dispenser-treated hives was not significantly different from that of the control hives. Neither queen mortality nor robbing activity was observed due to the treatments. Formic acid residues in honey collected in the nest were 3,855 +/- 2,061 and 3,030 +/- 1,624 mg/kg for the BeeVar- and the Liebig-Dispenser-treated hives, respectively. After 21 d from the end of the treatment, the residues fell to 1,261 +/- 1,054 and 794 +/- 518 mg/kg for the honey sampled from the BeeVar and Liebig-Dispenser groups, respectively.

摘要

在意大利撒丁岛的一个地中海地区的养蜂场,对两种甲酸秋季处理方法进行了测试,即凝胶包(BeeVar配方)和浸渍纸芯(Liebig分配器),以评估它们对狄斯瓦螨(Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman)的防治效果以及蜂蜜中的残留情况。两种处理方法在养蜂场防治蜂螨病方面均有效,螨虫死亡率百分比在93.6%至100%之间,两者之间无统计学差异。与Liebig分配器(每次处理约3天)相比,凝胶施用中甲酸的释放更为缓慢,使得作用时间更长(每次处理2周)。在第一次和第二次处理中,BeeVar的每日蒸发速率分别约为5至9克/天,Liebig分配器的每日蒸发速率分别约为26至35克/天。在整个处理期间,每个蜂箱施用的甲酸总量约为200克。与BeeVar处理组相比,Liebig分配器处理的蜂箱中成年蜜蜂死亡率显著更高。相反,BeeVar处理导致育雏中断,而Liebig分配器处理的蜂箱封盖子脾面积的扩展与对照蜂箱无显著差异。处理后未观察到蜂王死亡或盗蜂活动。BeeVar处理和Liebig分配器处理的蜂箱巢中采集的蜂蜜中甲酸残留量分别为3855±2061毫克/千克和3030±1624毫克/千克。处理结束21天后,从BeeVar组和Liebig分配器组采集的蜂蜜中残留量分别降至1261±1054毫克/千克和794±518毫克/千克。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验