Ardizzone Sandro, Bianchi Porro Gabriele
Chair of Gastroenterology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Drugs. 2005;65(16):2253-86. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565160-00002.
Despite all of the advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we still do not know its cause. Some of the most recently available data are discussed in this review; however, this field is changing rapidly and it is increasingly becoming accepted that immunogenetics play an important role in the predisposition, modulation and perpetuation of IBD. The role of intestinal milieu, and enteric flora in particular, appears to be of greater significance than previously thought. This complex interplay of genetic, microbial and environmental factors culminates in a sustained activation of the mucosal immune and non-immune response, probably facilitated by defects in the intestinal epithelial barrier and mucosal immune system, resulting in active inflammation and tissue destruction. Under normal situations, the intestinal mucosa is in a state of 'controlled' inflammation regulated by a delicate balance of proinflammatory (tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interferon [IFN]-gamma, interleukin [IL]-1, IL-6, IL-12) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, IL-11). The mucosal immune system is the central effector of intestinal inflammation and injury, with cytokines playing a central role in modulating inflammation. Cytokines may, therefore, be a logical target for IBD therapy using specific cytokine inhibitors. Biotechnology agents targeted against TNF, leukocyte adhesion, T-helper cell (T(h))-1 polarisation, T-cell activation or nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB, and other miscellaneous therapies are being evaluated as potential therapies for IBD. In this context, infliximab is currently the only biologic agent approved for the treatment of inflammatory and fistulising Crohn's disease. Other anti-TNF biologic agents have emerged, including CDP 571, certolizumab pegol (CDP 870), etanercept, onercept and adalimumab. However, ongoing research continues to generate new biologic agents targeted at specific pathogenic mechanisms involved in the inflammatory process. Lymphocyte-endothelial interactions mediated by adhesion molecules are important in leukocyte migration and recruitment to sites of inflammation, and selective blockade of these adhesion molecules is a novel and promising strategy to treat Crohn's disease. Therapeutic agents that inhibit leukocyte trafficking include natalizumab, MLN-02 and alicaforsen (ISIS 2302). Other agents being investigated for the treatment of Crohn's disease include inhibitors of T-cell activation, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, proinflammatory cytokine receptors and T(h)1 polarisation, and growth hormone and growth factors. Agents being investigated for treatment of ulcerative colitis include many of those mentioned for Crohn's disease. More controlled clinical trials are currently being conducted, exploring the safety and efficacy of old and new biologic agents, and the search certainly will open new and exciting perspectives on the development of therapies for IBD.
尽管我们对炎症性肠病(IBD)病理生理学的理解取得了诸多进展,但我们仍不清楚其病因。本综述讨论了一些最新可得的数据;然而,该领域变化迅速,免疫遗传学在IBD的易感性、调节和持续存在中发挥重要作用这一观点越来越被接受。肠道微环境,尤其是肠道菌群的作用,似乎比之前认为的更为重要。遗传、微生物和环境因素的这种复杂相互作用最终导致黏膜免疫和非免疫反应的持续激活,这可能是由肠道上皮屏障和黏膜免疫系统的缺陷促成的,从而导致活动性炎症和组织破坏。在正常情况下,肠道黏膜处于由促炎细胞因子(肿瘤坏死因子 [TNF]-α、干扰素 [IFN]-γ、白细胞介素 [IL]-1、IL-6、IL-12)和抗炎细胞因子(IL-4、IL-10、IL-11)的微妙平衡所调节的“受控”炎症状态。黏膜免疫系统是肠道炎症和损伤的核心效应器,细胞因子在调节炎症中起核心作用。因此,细胞因子可能是使用特异性细胞因子抑制剂治疗IBD的合理靶点。针对TNF、白细胞黏附、辅助性T细胞(T(h))1极化、T细胞激活或核因子(NF)-κB以及其他各种疗法的生物技术药物正在作为IBD的潜在疗法进行评估。在此背景下,英夫利昔单抗目前是唯一被批准用于治疗炎症性和瘘管性克罗恩病的生物制剂。其他抗TNF生物制剂已出现,包括CDP 571、赛妥珠单抗(CDP 870)、依那西普、昂瑞普和阿达木单抗。然而,正在进行的研究不断产生针对炎症过程中特定致病机制新型生物制剂。由黏附分子介导的淋巴细胞-内皮细胞相互作用在白细胞迁移和募集到炎症部位中起重要作用,选择性阻断这些黏附分子是治疗克罗恩病的一种新颖且有前景的策略。抑制白细胞转运治疗药物包括那他珠单抗、MLN-02和阿利卡福森(ISIS 2302)。其他正在研究用于治疗克罗恩病的药物包括T细胞激活抑制剂、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体、促炎细胞因子受体和T(h)1极化抑制剂以及生长激素和生长因子。正在研究用于治疗溃疡性结肠炎的药物包括许多上述用于克罗恩病的药物。目前正在进行更多对照临床试验,探索新旧生物制剂的安全性和有效性,这一探索肯定会为IBD治疗的发展开辟新的、令人兴奋的前景。