Nakamura Kazuhiko, Honda Kuniomi, Mizutani Takahiro, Akiho Hirotada, Harada Naohiko
Fukuoka-Higashi Medical Center, 1-1-1, Chidori, Koga-city, Fukuoka 811-3195, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 7;12(29):4628-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i29.4628.
The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not yet been clarified and immunosuppressive agents which non-specifically reduce inflammation and immunity have been used in the conventional therapies for IBD. Evidence indicates that a dysregulation of mucosal immunity in the gut of IBD causes an overproduction of inflammatory cytokines and trafficking of effector leukocytes into the bowel, thus leading to an uncontrolled intestinal inflammation. Such recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD created a recent trend of novel biological therapies which specifically inhibit the molecules involved in the inflammatory cascade. Major targets for such treatment are inflammatory cytokines and their receptors, and adhesion molecules. A chimeric anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody, infliximab, has become a standard therapy for CD and it is also likely to be beneficial for UC. Several anti-TNF reagents have been developed but most of them seem to not be as efficacious as infliximab. A humanized anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, adalimumab may be useful for the treatment of patients who lost responsiveness or developed intolerance to infliximab. Antibodies against IL-12 p40 and IL-6 receptor could be alternative new anti-cytokine therapies for IBD. Anti-interferon-gamma and anti-CD25 therapies were developed, but the benefit of these agents has not yet been established. The selective blocking of migration of leukocytes into intestine seems to be a nice approach. Antibodies against alpha4 integrin and alpha4beta7 integrin showed benefit for IBD. Antisense oligonucleotide of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) may be efficacious for IBD. Clinical trials of such compounds have been either recently reported or are currently underway. In this article, we review the efficacy and safety of such novel biological therapies for IBD.
炎症性肠病(IBD)的病因尚未明确,在IBD的传统治疗中使用了非特异性减轻炎症和免疫的免疫抑制剂。有证据表明,IBD患者肠道黏膜免疫失调会导致炎症细胞因子过度产生以及效应白细胞向肠道内迁移,从而引发失控的肠道炎症。对IBD发病机制的这些最新认识推动了新型生物疗法的发展趋势,这些疗法特异性抑制参与炎症级联反应的分子。此类治疗的主要靶点是炎症细胞因子及其受体以及黏附分子。一种嵌合抗TNF-α单克隆抗体英夫利昔单抗已成为克罗恩病(CD)的标准治疗药物,对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)可能也有益处。已经研发了几种抗TNF药物,但其中大多数似乎不如英夫利昔单抗有效。一种人源化抗TNF单克隆抗体阿达木单抗可能对那些对英夫利昔单抗失去反应或产生不耐受的患者的治疗有用。抗IL-12 p40和抗IL-6受体抗体可能是IBD的替代性新型抗细胞因子疗法。抗干扰素-γ和抗CD25疗法已被研发出来,但这些药物的益处尚未得到证实。选择性阻断白细胞向肠道内迁移似乎是一种不错的方法。抗α4整合素和抗α4β7整合素抗体对IBD显示出疗效。细胞间黏附分子1(ICAM-1)的反义寡核苷酸可能对IBD有效。此类化合物的临床试验最近已有报道或正在进行中。在本文中,我们综述了此类IBD新型生物疗法的疗效和安全性。