Noer Agate, Sørensen Anita L, Boquest Andrew C, Collas Philippe
Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Aug;17(8):3543-56. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-04-0322. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
Mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue can differentiate into mesodermal lineages. Differentiation potential, however, varies between clones of adipose stem cells (ASCs), raising the hypothesis that epigenetic differences account for this variability. We report here a bisulfite sequencing analysis of CpG methylation of adipogenic (leptin [LEP], peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 2 [PPARG2], fatty acid-binding protein 4 [FABP4], and lipoprotein lipase [LPL]) promoters and of nonadipogenic (myogenin [MYOG], CD31, and GAPDH) loci in freshly isolated human ASCs and in cultured ASCs, in relation to gene expression and differentiation potential. Uncultured ASCs display hypomethylated adipogenic promoters, in contrast to myogenic and endothelial loci, which are methylated. Adipogenic promoters exhibit mosaic CpG methylation, on the basis of heterogeneous methylation between cells and of variation in the extent of methylation of a given CpG between donors, and both between and within clonal cell lines. DNA methylation reflects neither transcriptional status nor potential for gene expression upon differentiation. ASC culture preserves hypomethylation of adipogenic promoters; however, between- and within-clone mosaic methylation is detected. Adipogenic differentiation also maintains the overall CpG hypomethylation of LEP, PPARG2, FABP4, and LPL despite demethylation of specific CpGs and transcriptional induction. Furthermore, enhanced methylation at adipogenic loci in primary differentiated cells unrelated to adipogenesis argues for ASC specificity of the hypomethylated state of these loci. Therefore, mosaic hypomethylation of adipogenic promoters may constitute a molecular signature of ASCs, and DNA methylation does not seem to be a determinant of differentiation potential of these cells.
脂肪组织来源的间充质干细胞可分化为中胚层谱系。然而,脂肪干细胞(ASC)克隆之间的分化潜能存在差异,这引发了一种假说,即表观遗传差异是造成这种变异性的原因。我们在此报告了对新鲜分离的人ASC以及培养的ASC中脂肪生成相关(瘦素[LEP]、过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ2[PPARG2]、脂肪酸结合蛋白4[FABP4]和脂蛋白脂肪酶[LPL])启动子以及非脂肪生成相关(肌细胞生成素[MYOG]、CD31和甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶[GAPDH])基因座的CpG甲基化进行的亚硫酸氢盐测序分析,以及与基因表达和分化潜能的关系。未培养的ASC显示脂肪生成相关启动子低甲基化,而肌生成和内皮基因座则是甲基化的。基于细胞间的异质性甲基化以及供体之间、克隆细胞系之间和内部给定CpG甲基化程度的变化,脂肪生成相关启动子呈现镶嵌式CpG甲基化。DNA甲基化既不反映转录状态,也不反映分化时基因表达潜能。ASC培养保留了脂肪生成相关启动子的低甲基化;然而,检测到克隆间和克隆内的镶嵌式甲基化。尽管特定CpG去甲基化并转录诱导,但脂肪生成分化仍维持LEP、PPARG2、FABP4和LPL的整体CpG低甲基化。此外,在与脂肪生成无关的原代分化细胞中,脂肪生成基因座甲基化增强,这表明这些基因座的低甲基化状态具有ASC特异性。因此,脂肪生成相关启动子的镶嵌式低甲基化可能构成ASC的分子特征,而DNA甲基化似乎不是这些细胞分化潜能的决定因素。