Tofteland Ståle, Haldorsen Bjørg, Dahl Kristin H, Simonsen Gunnar S, Steinbakk Martin, Walsh Timothy R, Sundsfjord Arnfinn
Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jan;45(1):199-205. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01319-06. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
Consecutive clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 87) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 25) with reduced susceptibilities to oxyimino-cephalosporins (MICs > 1 mg/liter) from 18 Norwegian laboratories during March through October 2003 were examined for bla(TEM/SHV/CTX-M) extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes, oxyimino-cephalosporin MIC profiles, ESBL phenotypes (determined by the ESBL Etest and the combined disk and double-disk synergy [DDS] methods), and susceptibility to non-beta-lactam antibiotics. Multidrug-resistant CTX-M-15-like (n = 23) and CTX-M-9-like (n = 15) ESBLs dominated among the 50 ESBL-positive E. coli isolates. SHV-5-like (n = 9) and SHV-2-like (n = 4) ESBLs were the most prevalent in 19 ESBL-positive K. pneumoniae isolates. Discrepant ESBL phenotype test results were observed for one major (CTX-M-9) and several minor (TEM-128 and SHV-2/-28) ESBL groups and in SHV-1/-11-hyperproducing isolates. Negative or borderline ESBL results were observed when low-MIC oxyimino-cephalosporin substrates were used to detect clavulanic acid (CLA) synergy. CLA synergy was detected by the ESBL Etest and the DDS method but not by the combined disk method in SHV-1/-11-hyperproducing strains. The DDS method revealed unexplained CLA synergy in combination with aztreonam and cefpirome in three E. coli strains. The relatively high proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli organisms with a low ceftazidime MIC in Norway emphasizes that cefpodoxime alone or both cefotaxime and ceftazidime should be used as substrates for ESBL detection.
2003年3月至10月期间,从挪威18个实验室收集了对氧亚氨基头孢菌素敏感性降低(最低抑菌浓度[MIC]>1mg/L)的大肠埃希菌(n = 87)和肺炎克雷伯菌(n = 25)的连续临床分离株,检测其bla(TEM/SHV/CTX-M)超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)基因、氧亚氨基头孢菌素MIC谱、ESBL表型(通过ESBL Etest以及纸片扩散法和双纸片协同试验[DDS]确定)以及对非β-内酰胺类抗生素的敏感性。在50株ESBL阳性大肠埃希菌分离株中,多重耐药的CTX-M-15样(n = 23)和CTX-M-9样(n = 15)ESBL占主导。SHV-5样(n = 9)和SHV-2样(n = 4)ESBL在19株ESBL阳性肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中最为常见。在一个主要的(CTX-M-9)和几个次要的(TEM-128和SHV-2/-28)ESBL组以及SHV-1/-11高产菌株中观察到ESBL表型检测结果不一致。当使用低MIC的氧亚氨基头孢菌素底物检测克拉维酸(CLA)协同作用时,观察到ESBL结果为阴性或临界值。在SHV-1/-11高产菌株中,通过ESBL Etest和DDS方法检测到CLA协同作用,但纸片扩散法未检测到。DDS方法在3株大肠埃希菌菌株中显示与氨曲南和头孢匹罗联合使用时存在无法解释的CLA协同作用。挪威产ESBL且头孢他啶MIC较低的大肠埃希菌比例相对较高,这强调应单独使用头孢泊肟或同时使用头孢噻肟和头孢他啶作为ESBL检测的底物。