Matricali Giovanni A, Dereymaeker Greta, Muls Erik, Flour Maria, Mathieu Chantal
Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Clinic, U.Z. Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2007 Jul;23(5):339-47. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.706.
To evaluate the economic aspects of diabetic foot care in a multidisciplinary setting.
A review of the English language literature, published from 1966 to November 2005.
The results of available studies on the cost-of-illness of diabetic foot problems are difficult to compare. Nevertheless trends concerning excess of costs, protraction in time of costs, positive correlation to severity of ulcer and/or peripheral vascular disease, contribution of in-hospital stay and length of stay, and the patient's own contribution to total costs, are obvious. Only a few cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies are available. Most use a Markov based model to predict outcome and show an acceptable result on long-term.
Diabetic foot problems are frequent and are associated with high costs. A multidisciplinary approach to diabetic foot problems has proved to be cost saving with regard to cost of treatment itself. Nevertheless, it remained unclear if these savings could offset the overall costs involved in implementing this kind of approach. The few studies that address this issue specifically all show an acceptable cost-effectiveness, but often the profit will be evident after some years only, because long-term costs are involved. Based on these data, policymakers should foresee sufficient reimbursement for preventive and early curative measures, and not only for 'salvage manoeuvres'.
评估多学科环境下糖尿病足护理的经济方面。
回顾1966年至2005年11月发表的英文文献。
关于糖尿病足问题疾病成本的现有研究结果难以比较。然而,关于成本过高、成本持续时间延长、与溃疡和/或外周血管疾病严重程度呈正相关、住院时间和住院时长的贡献以及患者自身对总成本的贡献等趋势是明显的。仅有少数成本效益和成本效用研究。大多数研究使用基于马尔可夫模型来预测结果,并显示出长期可接受的结果。
糖尿病足问题很常见且成本高昂。事实证明,针对糖尿病足问题采取多学科方法在治疗成本本身方面具有成本节约效果。然而,尚不清楚这些节约是否能够抵消实施这种方法所涉及的总体成本。专门探讨这一问题的少数研究均显示出可接受的成本效益,但由于涉及长期成本,往往要过几年利润才会显现。基于这些数据,政策制定者应预见到对预防和早期治疗措施给予足够的报销,而不仅仅是对“挽救行动”给予报销。