Rossi Simone, Ferro Marisa, Cincotta Massimo, Ulivelli Monica, Bartalini Sabina, Miniussi Carlo, Giovannelli Fabio, Passero Stefano
Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione Neurologia, Università di Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, I-53100 Siena, Italy.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;118(3):709-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
There is growing interest in neuropsychiatry for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a neuromodulatory treatment. However, there are limitations in interpreting rTMS effects as a real consequence of physiological brain changes or as placebo-mediated unspecific effects, which may be particularly strong in psychiatric patients. This is due to the fact that existing sham rTMS procedures are less than optimal. A new placebo tool is introduced here, called real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device, which can simulate the scalp sensation induced by the real TMS, while leaving both the visual impact and acoustic sensation of real TMS unaltered.
Physical, neurophysiological and behavioural variables of monophasic and biphasic single-pulse TMS and biphasic 1Hz and 20Hz rTMS procedures (at different intensities) were tested in subjects who were expert or naïve of TMS. Results of the real TMS were compared with those induced by the REMP device and with two other currently used sham procedures, namely the commercially available Magstim sham coil and tilting the real coil by 90 degrees .
The REMP device, besides producing scalp sensations similar to the real TMS, attenuated the TMS-induced electric field (as measured by a dipole probe) to a biologically inactive level. Behaviourally, neither expert nor naïve TMS subjects identified the "coil at 90 degrees " or the "Magstim sham coil" as a real TMS intervention, whilst naïve subjects were significantly more likely to identify the REMP-attenuated TMS as real.
The "goodness of sham" of the REMP device is demonstrated by physical, neurophysiological, and behavioural results.
Such placebo TMS is superior to the available sham procedures when applied on subjects naïve to TMS, as in case of patients undergoing a clinical rTMS trial.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为一种神经调节治疗方法,在神经精神病学领域的关注度日益增加。然而,将rTMS效应解释为生理性脑变化的实际结果或安慰剂介导的非特异性效应存在局限性,这在精神科患者中可能尤为明显。这是因为现有的假rTMS程序并不理想。本文介绍了一种新的安慰剂工具,称为真实电磁安慰剂(REMP)装置,它可以模拟真实TMS引起的头皮感觉,同时保持真实TMS的视觉影响和听觉感觉不变。
在TMS专家或新手受试者中测试了单相和双相单脉冲TMS以及双相1Hz和20Hz rTMS程序(不同强度)的物理、神经生理和行为变量。将真实TMS的结果与REMP装置诱导的结果以及另外两种目前使用的假程序的结果进行比较,另外两种假程序分别是市售的Magstim假线圈和将真实线圈倾斜90度。
REMP装置除了产生与真实TMS相似的头皮感觉外,还将TMS诱导的电场(通过偶极探针测量)衰减到生物无活性水平。在行为上,无论是TMS专家还是新手受试者都没有将“90度线圈”或“Magstim假线圈”识别为真实的TMS干预,而新手受试者更有可能将REMP衰减的TMS识别为真实的。
REMP装置的“假刺激质量”通过物理、神经生理和行为结果得到了证明。
当应用于对TMS不熟悉的受试者时,如在进行临床rTMS试验的患者中,这种安慰剂TMS优于现有的假程序。