Rattray Janice, Jones Martyn C
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Feb;16(2):234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.
The aims of this paper were (1) to raise awareness of the issues in questionnaire development and subsequent psychometric evaluation, and (2) to provide strategies to enable nurse researchers to design and develop their own measure and evaluate the quality of existing nursing measures.
The number of questionnaires developed by nurses has increased in recent years. While the rigour applied to the questionnaire development process may be improving, we know that nurses are still not generally adept at the psychometric evaluation of new measures. This paper explores the process by which a reliable and valid questionnaire can be developed.
We critically evaluate the theoretical and methodological issues associated with questionnaire design and development and present a series of heuristic decision-making strategies at each stage of such development. The range of available scales is presented and we discuss strategies to enable item generation and development. The importance of stating a priori the number of factors expected in a prototypic measure is emphasized. Issues of reliability and validity are explored using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and illustrated using examples from recent nursing research literature.
Questionnaire design and development must be supported by a logical, systematic and structured approach. To aid this process we present a framework that supports this and suggest strategies to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the new and developing measure.
In developing the evidence base of nursing practice using this method of data collection, it is vital that questionnaire design incorporates preplanned methods to establish reliability and validity. Failure to develop a questionnaire sufficiently may lead to difficulty interpreting results, and this may impact upon clinical or educational practice. This paper presents a critical evaluation of the questionnaire design and development process and demonstrates good practice at each stage of this process.
本文的目的是(1)提高对问卷编制及后续心理测量学评估中问题的认识,以及(2)提供策略,使护士研究人员能够设计和开发自己的测量工具,并评估现有护理测量工具的质量。
近年来护士编制的问卷数量有所增加。虽然问卷编制过程的严谨性可能在提高,但我们知道护士在新测量工具的心理测量学评估方面总体上仍不熟练。本文探讨了如何编制一份可靠且有效的问卷。
我们批判性地评估与问卷设计和编制相关的理论和方法问题,并在这一编制过程的每个阶段提出一系列启发式决策策略。介绍了可用量表的范围,并讨论了生成和开发条目的策略。强调了预先说明原型测量工具中预期因素数量的重要性。使用项目分析和探索性因素分析探讨信度和效度问题,并通过近期护理研究文献中的实例进行说明。
问卷设计和编制必须以逻辑、系统和结构化的方法为支撑。为辅助这一过程,我们提出一个支持此过程的框架,并建议一些策略来证明新的和正在开发的测量工具的信度和效度。
在使用这种数据收集方法建立护理实践的证据基础时,问卷设计纳入预先规划的方法以建立信度和效度至关重要。问卷编制不充分可能导致结果解释困难,这可能会影响临床或教育实践。本文对问卷设计和编制过程进行了批判性评估,并展示了该过程每个阶段的良好实践。