Ellis Matthew J, Ma Cynthia
Medical Oncology, Washington University, Campus Box 8056, 660 Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9701-x. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have consistently reported lower response rates in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer when compared with HR- cases. Preoperative endocrine therapy has therefore become a logical alternative and has gained considerable momentum from the finding that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are more effective than tamoxifen for HR+ breast cancer in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. The most convincing neoadjuvant trial to demonstrate the superiority of an AI versus tamoxifen was the P024 study, a large multinational double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer ineligible for breast-conserving surgery. The overall response rate (ORR) was 55% for letrozole and 36% for tamoxifen (P<0.001). Significantly more letrozole-treated patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (45 vs. 35%, respectively; P=0.022). In addition, ORR was significantly higher with letrozole than tamoxifen in the human epidermal growth factor receptor HER1/HER2+ subgroup (P=0.0004). The clinical efficacy of letrozole in HER2+ breast cancer was confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis and was found to be comparable to that of HER2- cases (ORR 71% in both subsets). Biomarker studies confirmed the superiority of letrozole in centrally assessed estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors and found a strong relationship with the degree of ER positivity for both agents. Interestingly, letrozole was effective even in marginally ER+ tumors and, unlike tamoxifen, consistently reduced the expression from estrogen-regulated genes (progesterone receptor and trefoil factor 1). Furthermore, when analyzed by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, letrozole was significantly more effective than tamoxifen in reducing tumor proliferation (P=0.0009). Thus, neoadjuvant letrozole is safe and superior to tamoxifen in the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ locally advanced breast cancer.
新辅助化疗试验一直报告称,与激素受体阴性(HR-)的乳腺癌病例相比,激素受体阳性(HR+)的乳腺癌缓解率较低。因此,术前内分泌治疗成为一种合理的替代方案,并且由于发现芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)在新辅助和辅助治疗中对HR+乳腺癌比他莫昔芬更有效,这一方案获得了相当大的推动力。证明AI优于他莫昔芬的最有说服力的新辅助试验是P024研究,这是一项针对不符合保乳手术条件的绝经后HR+乳腺癌女性的大型跨国双盲试验。来曲唑组的总缓解率(ORR)为55%,他莫昔芬组为36%(P<0.001)。接受来曲唑治疗的患者接受保乳手术的比例显著更高(分别为45%和35%;P=0.022)。此外,在人表皮生长因子受体HER1/HER2+亚组中,来曲唑的ORR显著高于他莫昔芬(P=0.0004)。荧光原位杂交分析证实了来曲唑在HER2+乳腺癌中的临床疗效,并且发现其与HER2-病例相当(两个亚组的ORR均为71%)。生物标志物研究证实了来曲唑在中心评估的雌激素受体阳性(ER+)肿瘤中的优越性,并发现两种药物与ER阳性程度都有很强的关系。有趣的是,来曲唑即使在边缘ER+肿瘤中也有效,并且与他莫昔芬不同,它持续降低雌激素调节基因(孕激素受体和三叶因子1)的表达。此外,通过Ki67免疫组织化学分析,来曲唑在降低肿瘤增殖方面比他莫昔芬显著更有效(P=0.0009)。因此,新辅助来曲唑在治疗绝经后HR+局部晚期乳腺癌方面安全且优于他莫昔芬。