Zambon Francesco, Fedeli Ugo, Marchesan Maria, Schievano Elena, Ferro Antonio, Spolaore Paolo
Regional Center for Epidemiology, Veneto Region, Via Ospedale 18, 31033 Castelfranco Veneto, Italy.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 9;8:233. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-233.
The effects of seat belt laws and public education campaigns on seat belt use are assessed on the basis of observational or self-reported data on seat belt use. Previous studies focusing on front seat occupants have shown that self-reports indicate a greater seat belt usage than observational findings. Whether this over-reporting in self reports applies to rear seat belt usage, and to what extent, have yet to be investigated. We aimed to evaluate the over-reporting factor for rear seat passengers and whether this varies by gender and under different compulsory seat belt use conditions.
The study was conducted in the Veneto Region, an area in the North-East of Italy with a population of 4.7 million. The prevalence of seat belt use among rear seat passengers was determined by means of a cross-sectional self-report survey and an observational study. Both investigations were performed in two time periods: in 2003, when rear seat belt use was not enforced by primary legislation, and in 2005, after rear seat belt use had become compulsory (June 2003). Overall, 8138 observations and 7902 interviews were recorded. Gender differences in the prevalence of rear seat belt use were examined using the chi-square test. The over-reporting factor, defined as the ratio of the self-reported to the observed prevalence of rear seat belt use, was calculated by gender before and after the rear seat belt legislation came into effect.
Among rear seat passengers, self-reported rates were always higher than the observational findings, with an overall over-reporting factor of 1.4. We registered no statistically significant changes over time in the over-reporting factor, nor any major differences between genders.
Self-reported seat belt usage by rear passengers represents an efficient alternative to observational studies for tracking changes in actual behavior, although the reported figures need to be adjusted using an appropriate over-reporting factor in order to gain an idea of genuine seat belt use.
安全带法律和公众教育活动对安全带使用的影响是根据关于安全带使用的观察性数据或自我报告数据来评估的。以往针对前排乘客的研究表明,自我报告显示的安全带使用率高于观察结果。这种自我报告中的过度报告是否适用于后排安全带使用以及适用程度如何,尚待研究。我们旨在评估后排乘客的过度报告因素,以及这一因素是否因性别和不同的强制使用安全带条件而有所不同。
该研究在意大利东北部的威尼托地区进行,该地区人口为470万。通过横断面自我报告调查和观察性研究确定后排乘客中安全带的使用 prevalence。两项调查均在两个时间段进行:2003年,当时后排安全带使用尚未由主要立法强制实施;2005年,后排安全带使用成为强制性规定之后(2003年6月)。总共记录了8138次观察和7902次访谈。使用卡方检验检查后排安全带使用 prevalence 中的性别差异。过度报告因素定义为后排安全带使用自我报告 prevalence 与观察到的 prevalence 的比率,在后排安全带立法生效前后按性别计算。
在后排乘客中,自我报告率始终高于观察结果,总体过度报告因素为1.4。我们没有发现过度报告因素随时间有统计学上的显著变化,也没有发现性别之间的任何重大差异。
后排乘客自我报告的安全带使用情况是跟踪实际行为变化的观察性研究的有效替代方法,尽管报告的数字需要使用适当的过度报告因素进行调整,以便了解真正的安全带使用情况。