Suppr超能文献

塞来昔布与非选择性 NSAIDs 的 21 项随机对照试验的 GI 耐受性汇总分析。

Pooled analysis of GI tolerability of 21 randomized controlled trials of celecoxib and nonselective NSAIDs.

机构信息

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY 10017, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Mar;25(3):729-40. doi: 10.1185/03007990802714382.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability of celecoxib and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at approved doses in patients with common musculoskeletal conditions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective, pooled analysis of studies selected from the Pfizer Corporate Clinical Trials Registry. Study selection criteria were: (1) Data available as of October 31, 2004; (2) Randomized, parallel-group study design and planned treatment duration of >or= 2 weeks; (3) At least one nonselective NSAID (naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac) as a comparator; (4) At least one arm with 200 mg or 400 mg celecoxib per day; (5) Patients with osteoarthritis (OA), adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Data were pooled by treatment and by subject from the safety analysis population of each included study. Joint primary end points were the combined incidence of tolerability-related GI adverse events (AEs) (abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea, diarrhea, and flatulence), and time to study discontinuation due to any GI AE.

RESULTS

In all, 21 studies met the selection criteria. Across the safety analysis populations of the included studies, 7797 patients received celecoxib total daily dose 200 mg/day, 6653 received celecoxib total daily dose 400 mg/day, 2953 received naproxen, 499 received ibuprofen, and 5643 received diclofenac. Tolerability-related GI AEs were reported by significantly fewer celecoxib-treated patients (16.0%) than by those treated with naproxen (24.3%), ibuprofen (24.2%), or diclofenac (19.9%) (p < 0.0001 vs. each comparator). Time to study discontinuation due to any GI AE was significantly longer for celecoxib than for naproxen (p < 0.0001), ibuprofen (p = 0.002), or diclofenac (p = 0.048). In the RA subpopulation (n = 2857), there was no significant difference between the celecoxib and naproxen or ibuprofen groups in incidence of tolerability-related GI AEs and GI AEs.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations are inherent to the retrospective analysis design.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pooled analysis of celecoxib at approved doses in OA, RA, and AS, fewer celecoxib-treated patients in the overall population had tolerability-related GI AEs than patients treated with naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac. In addition, celecoxib-treated patients had a significantly longer time to study discontinuation due to GI AEs.

摘要

目的

比较在批准剂量下塞来昔布和非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在常见肌肉骨骼疾病患者中的胃肠道(GI)耐受性。

研究设计和方法

这是一项从辉瑞公司临床试验注册处中选择的研究的回顾性、汇总分析。研究选择标准为:(1)截至 2004 年 10 月 31 日的数据可用;(2)随机、平行组设计,计划治疗时间>或=2 周;(3)至少有一个非选择性 NSAID(萘普生、布洛芬或双氯芬酸)作为对照;(4)至少有一个每天 200 毫克或 400 毫克塞来昔布的治疗组;(5)患者患有骨关节炎(OA)、成人类风湿关节炎(RA)或强直性脊柱炎(AS)。数据由纳入研究的安全性分析人群中的每个治疗组和每个患者进行汇总。主要联合终点是与耐受性相关的 GI 不良事件(AE)(腹痛、消化不良、恶心、腹泻和腹胀)的发生率,以及因任何 GI AE 而停止研究的时间。

结果

共有 21 项研究符合选择标准。在纳入研究的安全性分析人群中,7797 例患者接受塞来昔布总日剂量 200 毫克/天,6653 例患者接受塞来昔布总日剂量 400 毫克/天,2953 例患者接受萘普生,499 例患者接受布洛芬,5643 例患者接受双氯芬酸。与接受萘普生(24.3%)、布洛芬(24.2%)或双氯芬酸(19.9%)治疗的患者相比,接受塞来昔布治疗的患者(16.0%)报告与耐受性相关的 GI AE 显著减少(p < 0.0001 与每个对照药物相比)。因任何 GI AE 而停止研究的时间,塞来昔布明显长于萘普生(p < 0.0001)、布洛芬(p = 0.002)或双氯芬酸(p = 0.048)。在 RA 亚组(n = 2857)中,塞来昔布组与萘普生或布洛芬组在与耐受性相关的 GI AE 和 GI AE 发生率方面无显著差异。

局限性

该局限性是回顾性分析设计所固有的。

结论

在这项对 OA、RA 和 AS 中批准剂量的塞来昔布的汇总分析中,与接受萘普生、布洛芬或双氯芬酸治疗的患者相比,接受塞来昔布治疗的患者总体人群中与耐受性相关的 GI AE 发生率更低。此外,塞来昔布治疗的患者因 GI AE 而停止研究的时间明显更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验