Suppr超能文献

通过挑战后血浆葡萄糖、胰岛素反应比以及胰岛素抵抗和/或分泌的其他指标进行风险评估以预测2型糖尿病的发生。

Risk assessment by post-challenge plasma glucose, insulin response ratio, and other indices of insulin resistance and/or secretion for predicting the development of type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Tanabe Naohito, Saito Kimie, Yamada Yukio, Takasawa Tetsuya, Seki Nao, Suzuki Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Health Promotion, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2009;48(6):401-9. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.48.1325. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find useful indices to identify subjects at high risk for developing diabetes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) surveys conducted during 1980 to 2001 in a Japanese community. Using personal charts of the surveys, 230 non-diabetics were followed for progression to type 2 diabetes. The usefulness of HbA(1C), fasting (Glucose(0)) and 1-hour (Glucose(60)) glucose levels during OGTT, and indices for insulin resistance and/or secretion to identify high risk subjects for diabetes were then analyzed.

MATERIALS

Data described in personal charts of the OGTT program for residents of Nishikawa Town, Niigata Prefecture, Japan.

RESULTS

During the 4.3+/-2.7 years of follow-up, 52 subjects progressed to type 2 diabetes. Assessing glucose and insulin levels during OGTT, Glucose(0), Glucose(60), "Insulin Response Ratio" (IRR(30), Insulin at 30 minutes / Fasting insulin; IRR(60), insulin at 60 minutes / fasting insulin), and insulin secretion / insulin resistance index (ISIRI(30)) were significantly associated with progression to type 2 diabetes even after the result for OGTT, body mass index, and familial history of diabetes were adjusted. These were also able to identify still higher risk subjects for type 2 diabetes from those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) although other indices for insulin resistance or secretion and hemoglobin A(1C) were less contributable for this purpose.

CONCLUSION

A combination of Glucose(0) and Glucose(60) can most cost effectively identify high risk subjects for type 2 diabetes from IGT. IRR(30), IRR(60) and ISIRI(30) can also be used for such identification. However, further studies are needed to clarify whether these indices are superior to Glucose(0) and Glucose(60).

摘要

目的

寻找有助于识别糖尿病高危人群的指标。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1980年至2001年在日本一个社区进行的75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)调查。利用这些调查的个人图表,对230名非糖尿病患者进行随访,观察其向2型糖尿病的进展情况。然后分析糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、空腹血糖(血糖0)和OGTT期间1小时血糖(血糖60)水平以及胰岛素抵抗和/或分泌指标在识别糖尿病高危人群方面的有效性。

材料

日本新潟县西川镇居民OGTT项目个人图表中描述的数据。

结果

在4.3±2.7年的随访期间,52名受试者进展为2型糖尿病。在评估OGTT期间的血糖和胰岛素水平时,即使在对OGTT结果、体重指数和糖尿病家族史进行调整后,血糖0、血糖60、“胰岛素反应比”(IRR30,30分钟时胰岛素/空腹胰岛素;IRR60,60分钟时胰岛素/空腹胰岛素)以及胰岛素分泌/胰岛素抵抗指数(ISIRI30)与进展为2型糖尿病仍显著相关。这些指标还能够从糖耐量受损(IGT)人群中识别出2型糖尿病风险更高的人群,尽管其他胰岛素抵抗或分泌指标以及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)在这方面的作用较小。

结论

血糖0和血糖60相结合能够最经济有效地从IGT人群中识别出2型糖尿病高危人群。IRR30、IRR60和ISIRI30也可用于此类识别。然而,需要进一步研究以明确这些指标是否优于血糖0和血糖60。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验