Parisini P, Di Silvestre M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G
Spine Surgery Department, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, Bologna 40136, Italy.
Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):82-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0990-0. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
Pedicle screw fixation enables enhanced three-dimensional correction of spinal deformities and effectively shortens the distal fusion level. However, the choice of distal fusion level is still controversial in single thoracic idiopathic scoliosis with the lumbar compensatory curve not crossing the middle line (Lenke type 1 with modifier A or King type III and IV curves).The authors retrospectively analyzed 31 patients treated by segmental pedicular instrumentation alone, affected by a single thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a compensatory lumbar curve not crossing the midline (Lenke 1A), with an average age of 16.3 years (range 10-22 years). The patients with regard to the King classification were also assessed. A statistical analysis was performed to determine whether the two groups (King III, King IV) presented differences concerning the level of the stable vertebra (SV), end vertebra (EV), and neutral vertebra (NV) and were also analyzed the results at follow-up regarding the relationships between the SV, EV, and lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the two curve types. In the King III type curve the SV, EV, and NV appeared to be more proximal than those of the King IV type curve and the segments between the SV, EV, and NV appeared to be reduced in King III curves compared with King IV curves. At a follow-up of 3.2 years (range 2.2-5) the thoracic curve showed a correction of 58.4% (from 62.3 degrees to 26.6 degrees ) and compensatory lumbar curve an average spontaneous correction of 52.4% (from 38.1 degrees to 18.1 degrees ).The position of the LIV was shorter than the position of the SV in 30 patients (97%) with an average "salvage" of 2.1 (from 1 to 4) distal fusion levels. Four cases (13%), all affected by a King IV type curve, presented at follow-up an unsatisfactory results due to an "adding on" phenomenon. The statistical analysis confirmed that this phenomenon was correlated with The King IV curve (P = 0.043; Chi-square test) and that the only predictive parameter for its onset was the LIV-SV difference (odds ratio = 0.093; with a confidence interval of 0.008-1): every time that in King IV curve type the LIV was three or more levels shorter than the stable vertebra at follow-up the "adding on" phenomenon was present. The authors conclude that Lenke's type 1 with modifier A includes two kinds of curves, King III and King IV and that the Lenke's type 2 curves and King V with the lumbar curve not crossing the middle line have a similar behavior. Therefore, it is of authors' opinion that "the adding on phenomenon" could be prevented by more rigidly defining K. IV versus K. III curves. In Lenke's 1/2 A-K. IV/V type with the rotation of the first vertebra just below the thoracic lower EV in the same direction as the thoracic curve, and when SV and EV show more than two levels of difference, it is necessary to extend the lower fusion down to L2 or L3 (not more than two levels shorter than the SV). Whereas in Lenke's 1/2 A-K. III/V with the rotation of the first proximal vertebra of lumbar curve in the opposite direction to the thoracic apex and when SV and EV show not more than two level gap differences, the position of the lowest instrumented vertebra can be two or three levels shorter than the stable vertebra with satisfactory postoperative spinal balance. Therefore, the stable vertebra and the rotation of lumbar curve are considered to be a reliable guide for selecting the lower level of fusion.
椎弓根螺钉固定能够增强脊柱畸形的三维矫正效果,并有效缩短远端融合节段。然而,在腰椎代偿性曲线未跨越中线的单胸段特发性脊柱侧凸(Lenke 1型伴修饰符A或King III型和IV型曲线)中,远端融合节段的选择仍存在争议。作者回顾性分析了31例仅接受节段性椎弓根内固定治疗的患者,这些患者均为单胸段青少年特发性脊柱侧凸且伴有未跨越中线的代偿性腰椎曲线(Lenke 1A),平均年龄16.3岁(范围10 - 22岁)。同时也对King分类的患者进行了评估。进行统计分析以确定两组(King III型、King IV型)在稳定椎(SV)、终椎(EV)和中立椎(NV)水平上是否存在差异,并分析随访结果中SV、EV与最低固定椎(LIV)之间的关系。统计分析显示两种曲线类型之间存在显著差异。在King III型曲线中,SV、EV和NV似乎比King IV型曲线更靠近近端,并且与King IV型曲线相比,King III型曲线中SV、EV和NV之间的节段似乎减少。在3.2年(范围2.2 - 5年)的随访中,胸段曲线矫正了58.4%(从62.3度降至26.6度),代偿性腰椎曲线平均自发矫正了52.4%(从38.1度降至18.1度)。在30例患者(97%)中,LIV的位置比SV的位置短,平均“挽救”2.1个(范围1 - 4个)远端融合节段。4例(13%)均为King IV型曲线患者,在随访时由于“附加”现象出现了不满意的结果。统计分析证实这种现象与King IV型曲线相关(P = 0.043;卡方检验),并且其发生的唯一预测参数是LIV - SV差异(优势比 = 0.093;置信区间为0.008 - 1):每次在King IV型曲线中,随访时LIV比稳定椎短三个或更多节段时,就会出现“附加”现象。作者得出结论,Lenke 1型伴修饰符A包括两种曲线类型,即King III型和King IV型,并且Lenke 2型曲线和腰椎曲线未跨越中线的King V型曲线具有相似的表现。因此,作者认为通过更严格地定义King IV型与King III型曲线,可以预防“附加现象”。在Lenke 1/2 A - King IV/V型中,胸段下部EV下方的第一椎体旋转方向与胸段曲线相同,并且当SV和EV显示出超过两个节段的差异时,有必要将下部融合延伸至L2或L3(比SV短不超过两个节段)。而在Lenke 1/2 A - King III/V型中,腰椎曲线的第一近端椎体旋转方向与胸段顶点相反,并且当SV和EV显示不超过两个节段的间隙差异时,最低固定椎的位置可以比稳定椎短两个或三个节段,术后脊柱平衡良好。因此,稳定椎和腰椎曲线的旋转被认为是选择下部融合节段的可靠指导。