Houchen Linzy, Steiner Michael C, Singh Sally J
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Research Group, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK.
Physiotherapy. 2009 Mar;95(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2008.09.004. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
To examine whether the benefits from strength training are sustained after an initial training period in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
MEDLINE (1966 to May 2008), CENTRAL (1948 to May 2008) and PEDro (1929 to May 2008).
Criteria for inclusion in this review were that study participants had COPD and undertook an intervention that included strength training. A period of follow-up (>/=12 weeks) after strength training and a measure of muscle strength taken at this time were required. All experimental study designs were accepted, and the publication language had to be English. Reviews were excluded. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of studies.
Only three eligible studies were identified (PEDro scores ranged from 5 to 7). Two studies found that the benefits from strength training were still evidental at 12 weeks and 12 months after an initial 12-week and 6-month training period, respectively. The other study found no difference between the control and training groups 12 weeks after a 12-week training intervention. Only one study discussed continuation of strength training during the follow-up period. The results of these studies could not be pooled for meta-analysis, as the study interventions and assessments were heterogeneous.
Despite an extensive search of the literature, only three articles were identified. Therefore, the long-term effects of strength training remain unknown. Further trials examining the sustainability of strength training with homogeneous populations, training programmes and assessments are warranted. This would enable the pooling of results for meta-analysis, and provide clearer recommendations to pulmonary rehabilitation practitioners.
探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在初始训练期后,力量训练的益处是否能持续存在。
医学文献数据库(MEDLINE,1966年至2008年5月)、考克兰系统评价数据库(CENTRAL,1948年至2008年5月)和循证医学图书馆(PEDro,1929年至2008年5月)。
纳入本综述的标准为研究参与者患有COPD并接受了包括力量训练的干预措施。力量训练后需要有一段随访期(≥12周),并在此期间测量肌肉力量。所有实验性研究设计均可接受,发表语言必须为英语。排除综述。使用PEDro量表评估研究的方法学质量。
仅识别出三项符合条件的研究(PEDro评分范围为5至7)。两项研究发现,分别在初始12周和6个月训练期后的12周和12个月时,力量训练的益处仍然明显。另一项研究发现在为期12周的训练干预12周后,对照组和训练组之间没有差异。只有一项研究讨论了随访期间力量训练的延续情况。由于研究干预措施和评估方法存在异质性,这些研究的结果无法合并进行荟萃分析。
尽管对文献进行了广泛检索,但仅识别出三篇文章。因此,力量训练的长期效果仍然未知。有必要进一步开展试验,以研究在同质人群、训练方案和评估条件下力量训练的可持续性。这将能够合并结果进行荟萃分析,并为肺康复从业者提供更明确的建议。