Heran Balraj S, Galm Brandon P, Wright James M
Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), Peninsula College of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Exeter, Noy Scott House, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon, UK, EX2 5DW.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD004643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004643.pub2.
Alpha blockers are occasionally prescribed for hypertension so it is important to determine and compare their effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).
To quantify the dose-related systolic and/or diastolic BP lowering efficacy of alpha blockers versus placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension.
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to April 2009), EMBASE (1980 to April 2009) and reference lists of articles.
Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed-dose monotherapy with an alpha blocker compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension.
Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. WDAE information was collected from the trials.
Only 10 trials evaluated the dose-related trough BP lowering efficacy of 4 different alpha blockers in 1175 participants with a baseline BP of 155/101 mm Hg. The data do not suggest that any one alpha blocker is better or worse at lowering BP. The best but unsatisfactory estimate of the trough BP lowering efficacy for alpha blockers is -8/-5 mmHg.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the limited number of published RCTs, the BP lowering effect of alpha blockers is modest; the estimate of the magnitude of trough BP lowering of -8/-5 mmHg is likely an overestimate. There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different alpha blockers. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with alpha blockers because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.
偶尔会为高血压患者开具α受体阻滞剂,因此确定并比较其对血压(BP)、心率及因不良反应导致停药(WDAE)的影响很重要。
量化α受体阻滞剂与安慰剂相比在治疗原发性高血压时与剂量相关的收缩压和/或舒张压降低疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(2009年第1期)、MEDLINE(1950年至2009年4月)、EMBASE(1980年至2009年4月)以及文章的参考文献列表。
双盲、随机、对照试验,评估在原发性高血压患者中,与安慰剂相比,固定剂量单药使用α受体阻滞剂3至12周的降压疗效。
两位作者独立评估偏倚风险并提取数据。联系研究作者获取更多信息。从试验中收集WDAE信息。
仅10项试验评估了4种不同α受体阻滞剂在1175名基线血压为155/101 mmHg的参与者中与剂量相关的谷值血压降低疗效。数据并未表明任何一种α受体阻滞剂在降低血压方面更好或更差。α受体阻滞剂谷值血压降低疗效的最佳但并不理想的估计值为-8/-5 mmHg。
基于已发表的随机对照试验数量有限,α受体阻滞剂的降压效果一般;-8/-5 mmHg的谷值血压降低幅度估计可能高估了。不同α受体阻滞剂之间在临床上并无有意义的降压差异。由于试验持续时间短且许多试验未报告不良反应,本综述未对与α受体阻滞剂相关的危害发生率做出良好估计。