Suppr超能文献

21 基因复发评分检测在化疗后淋巴结阳性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌绝经后妇女中的预后和预测价值:一项随机试验的回顾性分析。

Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial.

机构信息

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70314-6. Epub 2009 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 21-gene recurrence score assay is prognostic for women with node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. A low recurrence score predicts little benefit of chemotherapy. For node-positive breast cancer, we investigated whether the recurrence score was prognostic in women treated with tamoxifen alone and whether it identified those who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite higher risks of recurrence.

METHODS

The phase 3 trial SWOG-8814 for postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer showed that chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) before tamoxifen (CAF-T) added survival benefit to treatment with tamoxifen alone. Optional tumour banking yielded specimens for determination of recurrence score by RT-PCR. In this retrospective analysis, we assessed the effect of recurrence score on disease-free survival by treatment group (tamoxifen vs CAF-T) using Cox regression, adjusting for number of positive nodes.

FINDINGS

There were 367 specimens (40% of the 927 patients in the tamoxifen and CAF-T groups) with sufficient RNA for analysis (tamoxifen, n=148; CAF-T, n=219). The recurrence score was prognostic in the tamoxifen-alone group (p=0.006; hazard ratio [HR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.33-5.27, for a 50-point difference in recurrence score). There was no benefit of CAF in patients with a low recurrence score (score <18; log-rank p=0.97; HR 1.02, 0.54-1.93), but an improvement in disease-free survival for those with a high recurrence score (score > or =31; log-rank p=0.033; HR 0.59, 0.35-1.01), after adjustment for number of positive nodes. The recurrence score by treatment interaction was significant in the first 5 years (p=0.029), with no additional prediction beyond 5 years (p=0.58), although the cumulative benefit remained at 10 years. Results were similar for overall survival and breast-cancer-specific survival.

INTERPRETATION

The recurrence score is prognostic for tamoxifen-treated patients with positive nodes and predicts significant benefit of CAF in tumours with a high recurrence score. A low recurrence score identifies women who might not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy, despite positive nodes.

FUNDING

National Cancer Institute and Genomic Health.

摘要

背景

21 基因复发评分检测可预测接受他莫昔芬治疗的淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的预后。低复发评分预示着化疗获益较小。对于淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌,我们研究了在接受他莫昔芬单独治疗的患者中,复发评分是否具有预后意义,以及它是否可以识别出那些尽管复发风险较高,但可能无法从基于蒽环类药物的化疗中获益的患者。

方法

SWOG-8814 期试验是为绝经后淋巴结阳性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者进行的,结果表明,在他莫昔芬治疗前使用环磷酰胺、多柔比星和氟尿嘧啶(CAF)化疗(CAF-T)可使接受他莫昔芬单独治疗的患者的生存获益。选择肿瘤银行提供标本,通过 RT-PCR 测定复发评分。在这项回顾性分析中,我们使用 Cox 回归分析,按治疗组(他莫昔芬 vs CAF-T)评估复发评分对无病生存的影响,调整阳性淋巴结的数量。

结果

共有 367 份(他莫昔芬组和 CAF-T 组 927 例患者的 40%)标本有足够的 RNA 进行分析(他莫昔芬组 148 例,CAF-T 组 219 例)。在他莫昔芬单独治疗组,复发评分具有预后意义(p=0.006;风险比 [HR] 2.64,95%CI 1.33-5.27,复发评分相差 50 分)。在低复发评分(评分<18;log-rank p=0.97;HR 1.02,0.54-1.93)患者中,CAF 无获益,但在高复发评分(评分≥31;log-rank p=0.033;HR 0.59,0.35-1.01)患者中,无病生存得到改善,校正阳性淋巴结数量后。在治疗组间的复发评分交互作用在最初的 5 年内有统计学意义(p=0.029),但在 5 年后无额外预测(p=0.58),尽管 10 年后仍有累积获益。对于总生存和乳腺癌特异性生存,结果相似。

结论

复发评分可预测淋巴结阳性且接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者的预后,并且可以预测高复发评分肿瘤中 CAF 的显著获益。低复发评分可以识别出那些尽管存在阳性淋巴结,但可能无法从基于蒽环类药物的化疗中获益的女性。

资金来源

美国国立癌症研究所和基因组健康公司。

相似文献

4
First-generation genomic tests for breast cancer treatment.
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):6-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70347-X. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
8
Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 10;24(23):3726-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. Epub 2006 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning on Histopathological Images to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk and Chemotherapy Benefit.
medRxiv. 2025 May 16:2025.05.15.25327686. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.15.25327686.
2
Microcurrent stimulation induces cell death in p53-mutant and 5-FU-resistant breast cancer.
J Biol Chem. 2025 Jun 24;301(8):110414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110414.
3
Targeting the Enhanced Sensitivity of Radiotherapy in Cancer: Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges.
MedComm (2020). 2025 May 15;6(6):e70202. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70202. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Clinician's guide: expert insights on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;17:17588359251326710. doi: 10.1177/17588359251326710. eCollection 2025.
6
Awareness of genomic testing among patients with breast cancer in Europe.
Breast. 2025 Jun;81:104436. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104436. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
7
Multimodal histopathologic models stratify hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 2;16(1):2106. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57283-x.
8
Gene expression profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in lymph node-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Apr;210(2):229-247. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07596-0. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
9
Studying Alzheimer's disease through an integrative serum metabolomic and lipoproteomic approach.
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06148-4.
10
TDERS, an exosome RNA-derived signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in clear cell renal cell cancer: a multicohort study.
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Aug 19;4(4):382-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.07.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

6
Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):790-800. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801289.
8
The 70-gene prognosis-signature predicts disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in an independent validation study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0130-2. Epub 2008 Jul 27.
9
Competing causes of death from a randomized trial of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 20;100(4):252-60. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn014. Epub 2008 Feb 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验