Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8481-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0382-10.2010.
Cognitive control mechanisms allow individuals to behave adaptively in the face of complex and sometimes conflicting information. Although the neural bases of these control mechanisms have been examined in many contexts, almost no attention has been paid to their role in resolving conflicts between competing social cues, which is surprising given that cognitive conflicts are part of many social interactions. Evidence about the neural processing of social information suggests that two systems--the mirror neuron system (MNS) and mental state attribution system (MSAS)--are specialized for processing nonverbal and contextual social cues, respectively. This could support a model of social cognitive conflict resolution in which competition between social cues would recruit domain-general cognitive control mechanisms, which in turn would bias processing toward the MNS or MSAS. Such biasing could also alter social behaviors, such as inferences made about the internal states of others. We tested this model by scanning participants using functional magnetic resonance imaging while they drew inferences about the social targets' emotional states based on congruent or incongruent nonverbal and contextual social cues. Conflicts between social cues recruited the anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortex, brain areas associated with domain-general control processes. This activation was accompanied by biasing of neural activity toward areas in the MNS or MSAS, which tracked, respectively, with perceivers' behavioral reliance on nonverbal or contextual cues when drawing inferences about targets' emotions. Together, these data provide evidence about both domain-general and domain-specific mechanisms involved in resolving social cognitive conflicts.
认知控制机制使个体能够在面对复杂且有时相互冲突的信息时做出适应性的行为。尽管这些控制机制的神经基础在许多情况下都得到了研究,但几乎没有人关注它们在解决相互竞争的社会线索之间的冲突中的作用,这令人惊讶,因为认知冲突是许多社会互动的一部分。关于社会信息处理的证据表明,有两个系统——镜像神经元系统(MNS)和心理状态归因系统(MSAS)——分别专门用于处理非言语和情境社会线索。这可以支持一种社会认知冲突解决模型,即社会线索之间的竞争将招募领域一般性认知控制机制,而这些机制反过来又会偏向 MNS 或 MSAS。这种偏向也可以改变社会行为,例如对他人内部状态的推断。我们通过在参与者进行推断时使用功能磁共振成像扫描他们,这些推断是基于社会目标的非言语和情境社会线索的一致或不一致。社会线索之间的冲突招募了前扣带皮层和外侧前额叶皮层,这些大脑区域与领域一般性控制过程相关。这种激活伴随着对 MNS 或 MSAS 中神经活动的偏向,这分别与感知者在推断目标情绪时对非言语或情境线索的行为依赖相吻合。总之,这些数据提供了有关解决社会认知冲突的领域一般性和领域特殊性机制的证据。