Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Feb;28(2):221-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.650503. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Treatment outcomes improved in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to the introduction of new chemotherapies and monoclonal antibodies. This study describes current patterns of pharmacological treatment for mCRC in clinical practice in four European countries.
This cohort study used physician-survey data from the LifeLink Oncology Analyzer Database for mCRC patients in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. All patients aged ≥21 years at mCRC diagnosis and with data collected during 2009 were included. Treatment patterns were examined descriptively by lines of therapy.
The study sample included 2682 mCRC patients. In first-line, more patients received FOLFOX (infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin)- than FOLFIRI (infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan)-, containing regimens in Germany (42 vs. 30%) and Spain (25 vs. 16%), while in Italy and France the reverse was true (Italy: 34% FOLFIRI vs.29% FOLFOX; France: 26 vs. 19%). In second-line, FOLFIRI-containing regimens were more commonly used than FOLFOX-containing regimens in Germany (36 vs. 18%), Italy (29 vs. 14%), and Spain (34 vs. 6%), while similar proportions of FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were used in France (18 vs. 15%). As part of first-line treatment, bevacizumab use ranged from 44% of patients in Italy to 30% in Spain, with slightly lower rates in second-line. Cetuximab first-line use ranged from 14% of patients in Spain to 7% in Italy, increasing in second-line to 30% in Spain, 26% in Italy, 20% in Germany, and 17% in France.
This analysis focused on description of treatment patterns, however, the actual clinical benefits of these treatment regimens on survival or quality of life were not addressed due to lack of relevant information in the data source. Some country differences in treatment patterns were observed. These differences might be partly explained by differences in local treatment guidelines, physician prescribing behaviours, reimbursement policies, and response to various regimens due to genetic differences.
In clinical practice in four European countries, FOLFOX- and FOLFIRI-based regimens are common standard of care chemotherapies for mCRC (FOLFOX and bevacizumab + FOLFIRI are the most common regimens), and monoclonal antibodies are often combined with these chemotherapies.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)新化疗药物和单克隆抗体的引入改善了治疗效果。本研究描述了在法国、德国、意大利和西班牙四个欧洲国家的临床实践中 mCRC 的当前药物治疗模式。
本队列研究使用来自 LifeLink Oncology Analyzer 数据库的医生调查数据,纳入 mCRC 患者。所有患者均在 mCRC 诊断时年龄≥21 岁,且数据收集于 2009 年。通过治疗线描述性地检查治疗模式。
研究样本包括 2682 例 mCRC 患者。在一线治疗中,德国(42% vs. 30%)和西班牙(25% vs. 16%)中使用 FOLFOX(输注 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸和奥沙利铂)的患者多于 FOLFIRI(输注 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸和伊立替康),而意大利和法国则相反(意大利:34% FOLFIRI vs. 29% FOLFOX;法国:26% vs. 19%)。在二线治疗中,德国(36% vs. 18%)、意大利(29% vs. 14%)和西班牙(34% vs. 6%)中更常使用 FOLFIRI 方案,而法国则相似(18% vs. 15%)。FOLFOX 方案和 FOLFIRI 方案在一线治疗中均有使用,在意大利,贝伐珠单抗的使用率为 44%,在西班牙为 30%,二线治疗中的使用率略低。西妥昔单抗在西班牙的一线使用率为 14%,在意大利为 7%,二线治疗中的使用率增加到西班牙 30%,意大利 26%,德国 20%,法国 17%。
本分析重点描述了治疗模式,但由于数据源中缺乏相关信息,并未探讨这些治疗方案对生存或生活质量的实际临床获益。观察到一些国家之间的治疗模式差异。这些差异可能部分归因于当地治疗指南、医生处方行为、报销政策以及由于遗传差异对各种方案的反应的差异。
在四个欧洲国家的临床实践中,FOLFOX 和 FOLFIRI 为基础的方案是 mCRC 的标准化疗方案(FOLFOX 和贝伐单抗+FOLFIRI 是最常用的方案),单克隆抗体通常与这些化疗方案联合使用。