Suppr超能文献

贝伐珠单抗联合 FOLFOX 或 FOLFIRI 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的治疗模式和临床结局:来自贝伐珠单抗观察性队列研究 ARIES 的结果。

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initially treated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab: results from ARIES, a bevacizumab observational cohort study.

机构信息

GI Oncology Research and Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 250 25th Avenue N, Suite 100, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1486-95. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0190. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Avastin Registry: Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) study is a prospective, community-based observational cohort study that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of first-line treatment patterns, assessing the impact of chemotherapy choice and treatment duration.

METHODS

The ARIES study enrolled patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab and followed them longitudinally. The protocol did not specify treatment regimens or assessments. Analyses included all patients who initiated bevacizumab in combination with either first-line oxaliplatin with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

In total, 1,550 patients with first-line mCRC were enrolled (median follow-up, 21 months) and most received FOLFOX-bevacizumab (n = 968) or FOLFIRI-bevacizumab (n = 243) as first-line therapy. The baseline characteristics and median treatment duration were generally similar between subgroups. There were no significant differences in the median PFS (10.3 months vs. 10.2 months) or OS (23.7 months vs. 25.5 months) time between the FOLFOX-bevacizumab and FOLFIRI-bevacizumab subgroups, respectively, by unadjusted analyses. Multivariate analyses showed FOLFIRI-bevacizumab resulted in a similar PFS (HR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.21) and OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78-1.16) outcome as with FOLFOX-bevacizumab. The incidence proportions of bevacizumab-associated adverse events were similar for FOLFOX- and FOLFIRI-based therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

In first-line mCRC patients, the FOLFOX-bevacizumab and FOLFIRI-bevacizumab regimens were associated with similar treatment patterns and clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

阿瓦斯汀注册研究:有效性和安全性调查(ARIES)是一项前瞻性的、基于社区的观察性队列研究,评估了一线治疗模式的有效性和安全性,评估了化疗选择和治疗持续时间的影响。

方法

ARIES 研究纳入了接受贝伐单抗联合一线化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的患者,并对其进行了纵向随访。该方案未指定治疗方案或评估方法。分析包括所有开始接受贝伐单抗联合一线奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸(FOLFOX)或伊立替康联合氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸(FOLFIRI)治疗的患者。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)时间采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计。使用多变量 Cox 回归分析估计风险比(HR),并调整了潜在的混杂因素。

结果

共纳入 1550 例一线 mCRC 患者(中位随访 21 个月),大多数患者接受 FOLFOX-贝伐单抗(n=968)或 FOLFIRI-贝伐单抗(n=243)作为一线治疗。亚组间基线特征和中位治疗持续时间总体相似。未调整分析显示,FOLFOX-贝伐单抗和 FOLFIRI-贝伐单抗亚组之间的中位 PFS(10.3 个月 vs. 10.2 个月)和 OS(23.7 个月 vs. 25.5 个月)时间无显著差异。多变量分析显示,FOLFIRI-贝伐单抗的 PFS(HR,1.03;95%置信区间[CI],0.88-1.21)和 OS(HR,0.95;95%CI,0.78-1.16)结果与 FOLFOX-贝伐单抗相似。基于 FOLFOX 和 FOLFIRI 的治疗方案,贝伐单抗相关不良事件的发生率比例相似。

结论

在一线 mCRC 患者中,FOLFOX-贝伐单抗和 FOLFIRI-贝伐单抗方案与相似的治疗模式和临床结局相关。

相似文献

6
Patterns of treatment with chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer in Western Europe.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Feb;28(2):221-9. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.650503. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Prescrire Int. 2010 Oct;19(109):219-24.

引用本文的文献

2
Progress of research on molecular targeted therapies for colorectal cancer.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1160949. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1160949. eCollection 2023.
3
The Value of Pharmaceutical Industry-Sponsored Patient Registries in Oncology Clinical Research.
Oncologist. 2023 Aug 3;28(8):657-663. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad110.
4
Using Bayesian Evidence Synthesis Methods to Incorporate Real-World Evidence in Surrogate Endpoint Evaluation.
Med Decis Making. 2023 Jul;43(5):539-552. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231162852. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
5
Bevacizumab Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real-World Clinical Practice.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 13;59(2):350. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020350.
6
Current Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 15;24(2):1702. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021702.
7
Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and cancer risk: A bidirectional mendelian randomization.
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 7;13:981032. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.981032. eCollection 2022.
8
CHK2 activation contributes to the development of oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer.
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(9):1615-1628. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01946-9. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Effect of bevacizumab combined with first-line chemotherapy on metastatic colorectal cancer.
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Apr 15;13(4):3609-3617. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
TS and ERCC-1 mRNA expressions and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colon cancer in CONFIRM-1 and -2 clinical trials.
Pharmacogenomics J. 2012 Oct;12(5):404-11. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2011.29. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验