Suppr超能文献

厄洛替尼联合多西他赛治疗晚期和难治性肝细胞癌及胆管癌的Ⅱ期临床试验:印第安纳大学肿瘤学组 GI06-101。

Phase II trial of erlotinib and docetaxel in advanced and refractory hepatocellular and biliary cancers: Hoosier Oncology Group GI06-101.

机构信息

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, 535 Barnhill Drive, RT473, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2012;17(1):13. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0253. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced hepatocellular (HCC) and biliary tract carcinomas (BTC) have poor prognosis. While the EGFR pathway is overactive in HCC and BTC, single agent anti-EGFR therapies confer modest activity. Preclinical data showed synergistic antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects between anti-EGFR therapies and taxanes. We conducted a phase I study of erlotinib and docetaxel in solid tumors, and noted good tolerability and sustained complete (5 years +) and partial responses in patients with HCC and BTC. This trial evaluated the efficacy of erlotinib with docetaxel in refractory hepatobiliary cancers.

METHODS

Eligible patients were allowed to have two prior systemic therapies. Docetaxel 30 mg/m2 i.v. was administered on days 1, 8, 15, and erlotinib 150 mg was dosed orally on days 2-7, 9-14, 16-28 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was 16 weeks progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included response, stable disease, and overall survival. Tumor samples were analyzed for KRAS gene mutations and E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients with BTC and HCC were accrued and assessed in separate strata for the efficacy endpoints, but for the two-stage initial design of the study, combined PFS was considered. A Simon optimal two-stage design tested the hypothesis that the 16-week PFS is ≤ 15% (clinically inactive) versus the alternative of ≥ 30% (warranting further study).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients, 14 with HCC and 11 with BTC, were enrolled. Common toxicities were rash (76%), diarrhea (56%), and fatigue (52%), mostly grade 1 or 2. No objective responses were seen. Seven BTC (64%) and 6 HCC patients (46%) had stable disease as best response, with a median duration of 16.1 weeks (95% CI 3.7-56.3) for BTC, and 17.6 weeks (95% CI 8.1-49.8) for HCC. The 16-week PFS was 64% for BTC (95% CI 29.7-84.5), and 38% for HCC (95% CI 14.1-62.8). Median overall survival was 5.7 and 6.7 months for BTC and HCC patients, respectively. BTC patients with grade ≥ 2 rash had higher median PFS (6.2 vs 2.2 months) and OS (14.2 vs. 4.2 months). HCC patients with negative/low E-cadherin expression had higher median PFS (6.7 vs. 2.1 months) and OS (14.5 vs. 4 months).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib with docetaxel met the 16-week PFS ≥ 30% endpoint, but overall survival was comparable to that seen with single-agent erlotinib. With the limitation of small numbers of patients, grade ≥ 2 rash (in BTC), and negative/low E-cadherin expression (HCC) were associated with higher PFS and OS. Discussion Refractory biliary tract and hepatocellular cancers are difficult to treat, and no chemotherapy or biologically targeted therapies have impacted survival. Based on preclinical synergism and prior phase I data, we conducted a multi-institutional study sequentially combining the EGFR-targeted agent erlotinib with docetaxel. Results from this study show that the primary endpoint, 16-week PFS of ≥ 30%, was met for the combined group of BTC and HCC patients (as originally planned in the study design), as well as in each disease category: 63.6% for BTC and 38.5% for HCC patients. Nevertheless, no patients attained an objective response and the median survival of 5.7 months for BTC, and 6.7 months for HCC patients (while heavily pretreated), is comparable to that seen with single-agent EGFR-targeted therapies. Safety analysis shows that this regimen was generally well tolerated, and most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Few patients had reversible grade 3 transaminase elevation (8%), and severe anorexia, fatigue, and rash were uncommon. As expected, patients with grade ≥ 2 rash experienced higher PFS and OS, but this was noted only among the BTC group, likely because too few HCC patients had grade ≥ 2 rash. KRAS is an important predictive marker for anti-EGFR therapies for lung and colorectal cancers, but for HCC or the heterogeneous group of BTC (with 10-50% KRAS mutations) no significant correlations have been established. We were not able to identify a correlation between KRAS and benefit from erlotinib-based therapy, as all but one HCC patient had KRAS wild type gene status. Preclinical data in multiple tumor types showed that E-cadherin, a signature marker for an "epithelial" tumor phenotype when overexpressed, predicts EGFR pathway activation and determines sensitivity to EGFR-targeted agents. E-cadherin is often seen as a poor prognostic marker when downregulated, as noted during cancer progression. Not all studies demonstrate beneficial effects from E-cadherin overexpression, possibly due to histological expression variability or tumor type specificity for this biomarker. Six BTC and 8 HCC patients had evaluable tumor samples for E-cadherin analysis. While the numbers were small and conclusions should be viewed with caution, negative/low E-cadherin expression was associated with improved PFS and OS for hepatobiliary cancers (most significant in HCC) in this refractory patient population where we expected lower expression levels. In conclusion, the combination of erlotinib with docetaxel provided a 16-week PFS of ≥ 30% but showed no appreciable differences in overall survival from historical data with single-agent erlotinib. While EGFR represents an important target in this group of malignancies, it is clear that hepatobiliary cancers are heterogeneous, thus a meaningful improvement in survival most likely will require careful treatment selection based on patient tumor's molecular and genetic profiling.

摘要

背景

晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)和胆道癌(BTC)患者预后较差。尽管 EGFR 通路在 HCC 和 BTC 中过度活跃,但单一的抗 EGFR 治疗仅能带来适度的活性。临床前数据显示,抗 EGFR 治疗与紫杉烷类药物联合具有协同的抗增殖和促凋亡作用。我们进行了一项实体瘤中厄洛替尼和多西他赛的 I 期研究,并注意到 HCC 和 BTC 患者具有良好的耐受性和完全缓解(5 年+)和部分缓解。本试验评估了厄洛替尼联合多西他赛在难治性肝胆癌中的疗效。

方法

符合条件的患者允许有两种先前的系统治疗。多西他赛 30mg/m2 静脉滴注,第 1、8、15 天;厄洛替尼 150mg 口服,第 2-7、9-14、16-28 天,每 28 天周期。主要终点为 16 周无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括反应、稳定疾病和总生存期。通过免疫组织化学(IHC)分析肿瘤样本中的 KRAS 基因突变和 E-钙粘蛋白表达。BTC 和 HCC 患者分别在单独的分层中评估疗效终点,但对于研究的两阶段初始设计,联合 PFS 被认为是有效的。西蒙最优两阶段设计检验了以下假设:16 周 PFS≤15%(临床无效)与≥30%(值得进一步研究)。

结果

共纳入 25 例患者,其中 14 例为 HCC,11 例为 BTC。常见的毒性包括皮疹(76%)、腹泻(56%)和疲劳(52%),主要为 1 级或 2 级。未观察到客观反应。7 例 BTC(64%)和 6 例 HCC 患者(46%)的最佳反应为稳定疾病,BTC 的中位持续时间为 16.1 周(95%CI 3.7-56.3),HCC 的中位持续时间为 17.6 周(95%CI 8.1-49.8)。BTC 的 16 周 PFS 为 64%(95%CI 29.7-84.5),HCC 为 38%(95%CI 14.1-62.8)。BTC 和 HCC 患者的中位总生存期分别为 5.7 和 6.7 个月。BTC 患者中,2 级或以上皮疹患者的中位 PFS(6.2 个月比 2.2 个月)和 OS(14.2 个月比 4.2 个月)更高。HCC 患者中 E-钙粘蛋白表达阴性/低表达患者的中位 PFS(6.7 个月比 2.1 个月)和 OS(14.5 个月比 4 个月)更高。

结论

厄洛替尼联合多西他赛达到了 16 周 PFS≥30%的终点,但总生存期与单药厄洛替尼相当。由于患者数量有限,2 级或以上皮疹(BTC)和 E-钙粘蛋白表达阴性/低表达(HCC)与较高的 PFS 和 OS 相关。讨论:难治性胆道癌和肝细胞癌难以治疗,目前尚无化疗或生物靶向治疗能改善生存。基于临床前协同作用和先前的 I 期数据,我们进行了一项多机构研究,先后将 EGFR 靶向药物厄洛替尼与多西他赛联合使用。这项研究的结果表明,BTC 和 HCC 患者的主要终点(16 周 PFS≥30%)达到了(这是在研究设计中最初计划的),在每个疾病类别中也达到了:63.6%的 BTC 患者和 38.5%的 HCC 患者。尽管如此,没有患者获得客观反应,BTC 患者的中位总生存期为 5.7 个月,HCC 患者为 6.7 个月(尽管已经进行了大量的治疗),与单药 EGFR 靶向治疗相当。安全性分析表明,该方案总体耐受性良好,大多数不良事件为 1 级或 2 级。少数患者出现可逆性 3 级转氨酶升高(8%),严重厌食、疲劳和皮疹不常见。正如预期的那样,皮疹 2 级或以上的患者 PFS 和 OS 更高,但这仅在 BTC 组中观察到,可能是因为 HCC 患者的皮疹 2 级或以上的患者太少。KRAS 是肺和结直肠癌抗 EGFR 治疗的一个重要预测标志物,但对于 HCC 或 BTC(10-50%的 KRAS 突变)等异质性组,尚未建立显著相关性。我们未能确定 KRAS 与厄洛替尼为基础的治疗获益之间的相关性,因为除了一名 HCC 患者外,所有 HCC 患者的 KRAS 基因均为野生型。在多种肿瘤类型的临床前数据表明,E-钙粘蛋白是一种“上皮”肿瘤表型的标志性标记物,当过度表达时,它可以预测 EGFR 通路的激活,并决定对 EGFR 靶向药物的敏感性。当癌症进展时,E-钙粘蛋白通常被认为是预后不良的标志物。并非所有研究都表明 E-钙粘蛋白过表达有益,这可能是由于组织学表达的变异性或这种生物标志物的肿瘤类型特异性所致。6 例 BTC 和 8 例 HCC 患者有可评估的肿瘤样本进行 E-钙粘蛋白分析。尽管数量较少,结论应谨慎看待,但在我们预期表达水平较低的这种难治性患者人群中,E-钙粘蛋白阴性/低表达与肝胆癌(HCC 中最显著)的 PFS 和 OS 改善相关。总之,厄洛替尼联合多西他赛的 16 周 PFS 达到了≥30%,但与单药厄洛替尼相比,总生存期没有明显改善。尽管 EGFR 是这组恶性肿瘤的一个重要靶点,但很明显,肝胆癌是异质性的,因此,最有可能需要根据患者肿瘤的分子和遗传特征进行精心的治疗选择,以提高生存。

相似文献

9
A phase II study of lapatinib in patients with advanced biliary tree and hepatocellular cancer.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;64(4):777-83. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-0927-7. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Elevated THOC5 expression in liver cancer and its implications for tumor progression and therapeutic response.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1596120. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1596120. eCollection 2025.
4
Mechanisms and therapeutic targets of ErbB family receptors in hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review.
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):3156-3178. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-837. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
5
Prognostic and Predictive Molecular Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 17;14(4):1026. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041026.
6
Cholangiocarcinoma presenting as dysphagia and misdiagnosed as gastritis: a case report.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02156-6.
7
Cholangiocarcinoma: the quest for a second-line systemic treatment.
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S275-S288. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2018.10.05.
8
Bioinformatic Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines to the Efficacy of Nimotuzumab.
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jun 17;14:2611-2621. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S312770. eCollection 2021.
9
Role of EGFR and HER-2/NEU Expression in Gall Bladder Carcinoma (GBC).
J Lab Physicians. 2021 Mar;13(1):29-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726561. Epub 2021 May 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验