Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Aug;25(8):842-854.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
Clinical trials often rely on echocardiographic measures of left ventricular size and function as surrogate end points. However, the quantitative impact of factors that affect the reproducibility of these measures is unknown. To address this issue, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded Pediatric Heart Network designed a longitudinal observational study of children with known or suspected dilated cardiomyopathy aged 0 to 22 years from eight pediatric clinical centers.
Clinical data were collected together with 150 echocardiographic indices of left ventricular size and function. Separate observers performed duplicate echocardiographic imaging. Multiple observers performed measurements from three cardiac cycles to enable assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variability. The impacts of beat averaging (BA), observer type (local vs core), and variable type (areas, calculations, dimensions, slopes, time intervals, and velocities) on measurement reproducibility were studied. The outcome measure was percentage error (100 × difference/mean).
Of 173 enrolled subjects, 131 met criteria for dilated cardiomyopathy. BA, variable type and observer type all influenced percentage error (P < .0001). Core interobserver percentage error (medians, 11.4%, 10.2%, and 9.3% for BA using one, two, and three beats, respectively) was approximately twice the intraobserver percentage error (medians, 6.3%, 4.9%, and 4.2% for BA using one, two, and three beats, respectively). Slopes and calculated variables exhibited high percentage error despite BA. Chamber dimensions, areas, velocities, and time intervals exhibited low percentage error.
This comprehensive evaluation of quantitative echocardiographic methods will provide a valuable resource for the design of future pediatric studies. BA and a single core lab observer improve the reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Certain measurements are highly reproducible, while others, despite BA, are poorly reproducible.
临床试验常依赖超声心动图测量左心室大小和功能作为替代终点。然而,影响这些测量重现性的因素的定量影响尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,美国国立心肺血液研究所资助的儿科心脏网络设计了一项针对 0 至 22 岁患有已知或疑似扩张型心肌病的儿童的纵向观察性研究,这些儿童来自八个儿科临床中心。
收集临床数据和 150 项左心室大小和功能的超声心动图指标。分别由两名观察者进行重复超声心动图成像。多名观察者从三个心动周期进行测量,以评估观察者内和观察者间的变异性。研究了心跳平均(BA)、观察者类型(本地与核心)和变量类型(面积、计算值、尺寸、斜率、时间间隔和速度)对测量重现性的影响。测量指标为百分比误差(100×差异/均值)。
在 173 名入组的受试者中,有 131 名符合扩张型心肌病的标准。BA、变量类型和观察者类型均影响百分比误差(P<0.0001)。核心观察者间的百分比误差(中位数,分别为 BA 使用 1、2 和 3 次心跳时的 11.4%、10.2%和 9.3%)大约是观察者内百分比误差(中位数,分别为 BA 使用 1、2 和 3 次心跳时的 6.3%、4.9%和 4.2%)的两倍。尽管进行了 BA,斜率和计算变量仍表现出高百分比误差。腔室尺寸、面积、速度和时间间隔的百分比误差较低。
这项对定量超声心动图方法的全面评估将为未来儿科研究的设计提供有价值的资源。BA 和单个核心实验室观察者可提高扩张型心肌病儿童超声心动图测量的重现性。某些测量具有高度重现性,而其他测量尽管进行了 BA,但重现性较差。