Suppr超能文献

用于分娩疼痛管理的非阿片类药物。

Non-opioid drugs for pain management in labour.

作者信息

Othman Mohammad, Jones Leanne, Neilson James P

机构信息

Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009223.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Labour is a normal physiological process, but is usually associated with pain and discomfort. Numerous methods are used to relieve labour pain. These include pharmacological (e.g. epidural, opioids, inhaled analgesia) and non-pharmacological (e.g. hypnosis, acupuncture) methods of pain management. Non-opioid drugs are a pharmacological method used to control mild to moderate pain.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the evidence regarding the effects and safety of the use of non-opioid drugs to relieve pain in labour.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (15 February 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using non-opioid drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); paracetamol; antispasmodics; sedatives and antihistamines) in comparison with placebo or standard care; different forms of non-opioid drugs (e.g. sedatives versus antihistamines); or different interventions (e.g. non-opioids versus opioids) for women in labour. Quasi-RCTs and trials using a cross-over design were not included. Cluster-randomised RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all studies identified by the search strategy, carried out data extraction and assessed risk of bias. We resolved any disagreement through discussion with a third author. Data were checked for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Nineteen studies randomising a total of 2863 women were included in this review. There were three main comparison groups: 15 studies compared non-opioid drugs with placebo or no treatment (2133 women); three studies compared non-opioid drugs with opioids (563 women); and three studies compared one type of non-opioid drug with a different type or dose of non-opioid drug (590 women). Some of the studies included three or more groups and so have been put in more than one comparison. Overall, there was little difference between groups for most of the comparisons. Any differences observed for outcomes were mainly limited to one or two studies. Non-opioid drugs (sedatives) were found to offer better pain relief (mean difference (MD) -22.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.86 to -8.14, one trial, 50 women), better satisfaction with pain relief (sedatives and antihistamines) (risk ratio (RR) 1.59; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.21, two trials, 204 women; RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.79, one trial, 223 women) and better satisfaction with the childbirth experience (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.47, one trial, 40 women) when compared with placebo or no treatment. However, women having non-opioid drugs (NSAIDs or antihistamines) were less likely to be satisfied with pain relief compared with women having opioids (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.94, one trial, 76 women; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98, one trial, 223 women). Women receiving the antihistamine hydroxyzine were more likely to express satisfaction with pain relief compared with the antihistamine promethazine (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43, one trial, 289 women). Women receiving sedatives were more likely to express satisfaction with pain relief compared with antihistamines (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.17, one study, 157 women). The majority of studies were conducted over 30 years ago. The studies were at unclear risk of bias for most of the quality domains.Opioids appear to be superior to non-opioids in satisfaction with pain relief, while non-opioids appear to be superior to placebo for pain relief and satisfaction with the childbirth experience. There were little data and no evidence of a significant difference for any of the comparisons of non-opioids for safety outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings of this review demonstrated insufficient evidence to support a role for non-opioid drugs on their own to manage pain during labour.

摘要

背景

分娩是一个正常的生理过程,但通常会伴有疼痛和不适。人们采用了多种方法来缓解分娩疼痛。这些方法包括药理学方法(如硬膜外麻醉、阿片类药物、吸入镇痛)和非药理学方法(如催眠、针灸)。非阿片类药物是用于控制轻至中度疼痛的一种药理学方法。

目的

总结关于使用非阿片类药物缓解分娩疼痛的效果和安全性的证据。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2012年2月15日)。

入选标准

使用非阿片类药物(非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、对乙酰氨基酚、解痉药、镇静剂和抗组胺药)与安慰剂或标准护理进行比较的随机对照试验(RCTs);不同形式的非阿片类药物(如镇静剂与抗组胺药);或对分娩妇女采用不同干预措施(如非阿片类药物与阿片类药物)的试验。不包括半随机对照试验和采用交叉设计的试验。整群随机RCTs符合纳入标准,但未识别出符合纳入标准的试验。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估检索策略所识别的所有研究是否纳入,进行数据提取并评估偏倚风险。我们通过与第三位作者讨论解决了任何分歧。检查数据的准确性。

主要结果

本综述纳入了19项随机分配共2863名妇女的研究。有三个主要比较组:15项研究将非阿片类药物与安慰剂或不治疗进行比较(2133名妇女);三项研究将非阿片类药物与阿片类药物进行比较(563名妇女);三项研究将一种非阿片类药物与不同类型或剂量的非阿片类药物进行比较(590名妇女)。一些研究包括三个或更多组,因此被纳入不止一个比较中。总体而言,大多数比较组之间差异不大。观察到的任何结果差异主要限于一两项研究。发现非阿片类药物(镇静剂)能提供更好的疼痛缓解(平均差(MD)-22.00;95%置信区间(CI)-35.86至-8.14,一项试验,50名妇女),对疼痛缓解的满意度更高(镇静剂和抗组胺药)(风险比(RR)1.59;95%CI 1.15至2.21,两项试验,204名妇女;RR 1.80;95%CI 1.16至2.79,一项试验,223名妇女),与安慰剂或不治疗相比,对分娩体验的满意度更高(RR 2.16;95%CI 1.34至3.47,一项试验,40名妇女)。然而,与使用阿片类药物的妇女相比,使用非阿片类药物(NSAIDs或抗组胺药)的妇女对疼痛缓解的满意度较低(RR 0.50;95%CI 0.27至0.94,一项试验,76名妇女;RR 0.73;95%CI 0.54至0.98,一项试验,223名妇女)。与抗组胺药异丙嗪相比,接受抗组胺药羟嗪治疗的妇女更可能对疼痛缓解表示满意(RR 1.21;95%CI 1.02至1.43,一项试验,289名妇女)。与抗组胺药相比,接受镇静剂治疗的妇女更可能对疼痛缓解表示满意(RR 1.52;95%CI 1.06至2.17,一项研究,157名妇女)。大多数研究是在30多年前进行的。在大多数质量领域,这些研究的偏倚风险尚不清楚。阿片类药物在疼痛缓解满意度方面似乎优于非阿片类药物,而非阿片类药物在疼痛缓解和分娩体验满意度方面似乎优于安慰剂。关于非阿片类药物安全性结果的任何比较,数据很少且没有证据表明存在显著差异。

作者结论

总体而言,本综述的结果表明,没有足够的证据支持非阿片类药物单独用于管理分娩疼痛。

相似文献

1
Non-opioid drugs for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009223.pub2.
2
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 19;2016(5):CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub3.
3
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
4
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3.
5
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
6
Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 13;4(4):CD011989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011989.pub2.
7
Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (single dose) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 14;7(7):CD011352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011352.pub2.
8
Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2.
9
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009351.pub2.
10
Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD009356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009356.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic labor pain management techniques in a resource-limited setting: A systematic review.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jan 31;74:103312. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103312. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 7;2(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2.
4
Attention to childbirth and delivery in a university hospital: comparison of practices developed after Network Stork.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Apr 29;27:e3139. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2643-3139.
5
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3.
6
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 21;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
7
Immersion in water during labour and birth.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
8
Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.pub2.
9
Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 28;3(3):CD009290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub3.
10
[Pain therapy in obstetrics].
Schmerz. 2017 Dec;31(6):621-638. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0257-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009351.pub2.
2
Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD009200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009200.pub2.
3
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.
4
Intracutaneous or subcutaneous sterile water injection compared with blinded controls for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD009107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009107.pub2.
5
Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD009514. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.
6
Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
7
Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.
8
Aromatherapy for pain management in labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6(7):CD009215. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009215.
9
Biofeedback for pain management during labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD006168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006168.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验