Department of Medical Microbiology and Medical Immunology, Rijnstate, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Med Microbiol. 2012 Nov;61(Pt 11):1563-1567. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.047910-0. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) are emerging worldwide, making rapid and adequate ESBL detection crucial for infection control measures as well as for the choice of correct antimicrobial therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of a novel rapid ligation-mediated real-time PCR (LM-PCR) with a combination disc test (CDT). In total, 172 prospective putative ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae isolates from clinical specimens based on VITEK2 results were included in this study and tested with the phenotypic CDT and the LM-PCR. Positive ESBL results were obtained in 100 and 95 isolates using CDT and LM-PCR, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the LM-PCR were 99.0, 92.2, 98.6 and 94.0 %, respectively, compared with the CDT. The LM-PCR technique provides an important reduction in turnaround time (~4.5 h versus overnight incubation using CDT) for ESBL confirmation. As a consequence, all ESBL results are available within the same day, making this assay an important tool for rapid and accurate ESBL detection.
超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)在全球范围内不断出现,因此快速、准确地检测 ESBL 对于感染控制措施以及选择正确的抗菌治疗至关重要。本研究旨在比较新型快速连接介导实时 PCR(LM-PCR)与联合药敏纸片扩散试验(CDT)的性能。本研究共纳入了 172 例基于 VITEK2 结果的临床标本中潜在的产 ESBL 肠杆菌科分离株,并采用表型 CDT 和 LM-PCR 进行检测。CDT 和 LM-PCR 分别检出阳性 ESBL 结果 100 株和 95 株。与 CDT 相比,LM-PCR 的灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 99.0%、92.2%、98.6%和 94.0%。LM-PCR 技术为 ESBL 确认提供了重要的周转时间缩短(~4.5 小时,而使用 CDT 则需要过夜孵育)。因此,所有 ESBL 结果都可在同一天获得,这使得该检测成为快速、准确检测 ESBL 的重要工具。