Suppr超能文献

呼吸评分在急性细支气管炎评估中的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of the respiratory score in the assessment of acute bronchiolitis.

作者信息

Chin Ho Jen, Seng Quah Ban

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

出版信息

Malays J Med Sci. 2004 Jul;11(2):34-40.

Abstract

Children with bronchiolitis from Hospitals Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) and Hospital Kota Bharu (HKB) were student using the Kristjansson Respiratory Score and the Wang Respiratory Score respectively. Saturation of oxygen (S(a)O(2)) was measured with a pulse-oximeter while the child is breathing room-air. Two observers assessed the respiratory scores in all children independently. The correlation between respiratory scores and S(a)O(2) was assessed using Spearman's Rho, and the inter-rater reliability of respiratory scores determined using intraclasscorelation coefficient. There were 29 children in HUSM and 25 from HKB with a median age of 8 months (IQR 4.5 months) and 9 months(IQR 7 months) respectively. In HUSM, the median Kristjansson Respiratory Score for both observers was 4 (IQR 2), and the median S(a)O(2) was 96% (IQR 3%). The correlation coefficient between the Kristjansson Respiratory Score and S(a)O(2) for the first observer was - 0.75 (p <0.001), and for the second observer -0.73 (p <0.001). In HKB, the median Wang Respiratory Score was also similar for both observers (median 4 IQR 4.5), and the median (IQR) for S(a)O(2) was 96% (2%). The correlation coefficient between the Wang Respiratory Score and S(a)O(2) for the first observer was -0.41 (p = 0.04) and for the second observer -0.43 (p = 0.03). The inter-rater reliability between the first and second observer was high for both the Kristjansson Respiratory (ICC 0.89) and the Wang Respiratory Scores (ICC 0.99). In conclusion the validity of the Kristjansson Respiratory Score was high whereas the validity of the Wang Respiratory Score was moderate in the assessment of the severity of acute bronchiolitis. Both respiratory scores and physical signs showed high agreement between observers. The Kristjansson Respiratory Score should be considered for use by medical personnel in the assessment of the severity of acute bronchiolitis in children.

摘要

马来西亚理科大学医院(HUSM)和哥打巴鲁医院(HKB)的毛细支气管炎患儿分别使用克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分和王呼吸评分。在患儿呼吸室内空气时,用脉搏血氧仪测量血氧饱和度(S(a)O(2))。两名观察者独立评估所有患儿的呼吸评分。使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数评估呼吸评分与S(a)O(2)之间的相关性,并使用组内相关系数确定呼吸评分的观察者间信度。HUSM有29名患儿,HKB有25名患儿,中位年龄分别为8个月(四分位间距4.5个月)和9个月(四分位间距7个月)。在HUSM,两名观察者的克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分中位数均为4(四分位间距2),S(a)O(2)中位数为96%(四分位间距3%)。第一位观察者的克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分与S(a)O(2)之间的相关系数为-0.75(p<0.001),第二位观察者为-0.73(p<0.001)。在HKB,两名观察者的王呼吸评分中位数也相似(中位数4,四分位间距4.5),S(a)O(2)的中位数(四分位间距)为96%(2%)。第一位观察者的王呼吸评分与S(a)O(2)之间的相关系数为-0.41(p=0.04),第二位观察者为-0.43(p=0.03)。克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分(组内相关系数0.89)和王呼吸评分(组内相关系数0.99)在第一位和第二位观察者之间的观察者间信度都很高。总之,在评估急性毛细支气管炎的严重程度时,克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分的效度较高,而王呼吸评分的效度中等。两种呼吸评分和体征在观察者之间显示出高度一致性。在评估儿童急性毛细支气管炎的严重程度时,医务人员应考虑使用克里斯蒂安松呼吸评分。

相似文献

2
Comparison of Kristjansson Respiratory Score and Wang Respiratory Score in infants with bronchiolitis in a hospital emergency department.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020 Dec;40(2):145-153. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500146. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Validity and reliability of the modified Tal score in Chilean children. A multicenter study.
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;117(4):e340-e346. doi: 10.5546/aap.2019.eng.e340.
8
Bronchiolitis Score of Sant Joan de Déu: BROSJOD Score, validation and usefulness.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017 Apr;52(4):533-539. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23546. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
Validation of a scale to assess the severity of bronchiolitis in a population of hospitalized infants.
J Asthma. 2013 Dec;50(10):1056-61. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.834504. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
10
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the first breath: comprehensive respiratory syncytial virus prevention through maternal immunization and infant immunoprophylaxis.
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2025 Jul 28;19(3):116-130. doi: 10.2478/abm-2025-0015. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Assessing bronchiolitis severity: a comparative analysis of two commonly used clinical scoring systems.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 31;184(2):167. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06000-3.
3
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Children.
Pulm Med. 2024 Oct 18;2024:2131098. doi: 10.1155/2024/2131098. eCollection 2024.
5
Ambulatory chest physiotherapy in mild-to-moderate acute bronchiolitis in children under two years of age - A randomized control trial.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2021 Dec;41(2):99-108. doi: 10.1142/S1013702521500098. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Comparison of Kristjansson Respiratory Score and Wang Respiratory Score in infants with bronchiolitis in a hospital emergency department.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2020 Dec;40(2):145-153. doi: 10.1142/S1013702520500146. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
10
Systematic review of instruments aimed at evaluating the severity of bronchiolitis.
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2018 Jan;25:43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
OBSERVER DISAGREEMENT IN PHYSICAL SIGNS OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM.
Lancet. 1965 Aug 28;2(7409):412-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)90759-2.
2
Effect of oral and inhaled salbutamol in infants with bronchiolitis.
Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997 Feb;39(1):61-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1997.tb03557.x.
4
Nebulised racemic adrenaline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in infants and toddlers.
Arch Dis Child. 1993 Dec;69(6):650-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.69.6.650.
5
Oral versus nebulized albuterol in the management of bronchiolitis in Egypt.
J Pediatr. 1994 Jan;124(1):131-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70269-1.
7
Clinical scores for acute asthma in pre-school children. A review of the literature.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;47(6):635-46. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90211-9.
9
Wheezing in infants: the response to epinephrine.
Pediatrics. 1987 Jun;79(6):939-45.
10
Reliability of eliciting physical signs in examination of the chest.
Lancet. 1988 Apr 16;1(8590):873-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91613-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验