Vranken Jan H
Pain Relief Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2012 Dec;12(4):304-14. doi: 10.2174/187152412803760645.
Neuropathic pain, pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system, is relatively common, occurring in about 1% of the population. Studies in animal models describe a number of peripheral and central pathophysiological processes after nerve injury that would be the basis of underlying neuropathic pain mechanism. Additionally, neuro-imaging (positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging) provides insights in brain mechanisms corresponding with mechanistic processes including allodynia, hyperalgesia, altered sensation, and spontaneous pain. A change in function, chemistry, and structures of neurons (neural plasticity) underlie the production of the altered sensitivity characteristics of neuropathic pain. Peripheral processes in neuropathic pain involve production of mediators (cytokines, protons, nerve growth factor), alterations in calcium channels, sodium channels, hyperpolarisation-activated nucleotide-gated ion channels, and potassium channels, phenotypic switches and sprouting of nerves endings, and involvement of the sympathetic nervous system. Stimulation of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor, activation of microglia, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes, increased production of nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor together with loss of spinal inhibitory control are responsible for central neuron hyperexcitability and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Recent advances, including functional imaging techniques, in identification of peripheral and central sensitization mechanisms related to nervous system injury have increased potential for affecting pain research from both diagnostic as well as therapeutic view. Key brain regions involved in generating pharmacologically induced analgesia may be identified. Despite the progress in pain research, neuropathic pain is challenge to manage. Although numerous treatment options are available for relieving neuropathic pain, there is no consensus on the most appropriate treatment. However, recommendations can be proposed for first-line, second-line, and third-line pharmacological treatments based on the level of evidence for the different treatment strategies. Available therapies shown to be effective in managing neuropathic pain include opioids and tramadol, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, topical treatments (lidocaine patch, capsaicin), and ketamine. Tricyclic antidepressants are often the first drugs selected to alleviate neuropathic pain (first-line pharmacological treatment). Although they are very effective in reducing pain in several neuropathic pain disorders, treatment may be compromised (and outweighed) by their side effects. In patients with a history of cardiovascular disorders, glaucoma, and urine retention, pregabalin and gabapentine are emerging as first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. In addition these anti-epileptic drugs have a favourable safety profile with minimal concerns regarding drug interactions and showing no interference with hepatic enzymes. Alternatively, opioids (oxycodone and methadone) and tramadol may alleviate nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Despite the numerous treatment options available for relieving neuropathic pain, no more than half of patients experience clinically meaningful pain relief, which is almost always partial but not complete relief. In addition, patients frequently experience burdensome adverse effects and as a consequence are often unable to tolerate the treatment. In the remaining patients, combination therapies using two or more analgesics with different mechanisms of action may also offer adequate pain relief. Although combination treatment is clinical practice and may result in greater pain relief, trials regarding different combinations of analgesics (which combination to use, occurrence of additive or supra-additive effects, sequential or concurrent treatment, adverse-event profiles of these analgesics, alone and in combination) are scarce. If medical treatments have failed, invasive therapies such as intrathecal drug administration and neurosurgical stimulation techniques (spinal cord stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and motor cortex stimulation) may be considered.
神经性疼痛是由于影响躯体感觉系统的损伤或疾病直接导致的疼痛,相对较为常见,约占总人口的1%。对动物模型的研究描述了神经损伤后一些外周和中枢的病理生理过程,这些过程可能是潜在神经性疼痛机制的基础。此外,神经影像学(正电子发射断层扫描和功能磁共振成像)为与包括痛觉过敏、痛觉超敏、感觉改变和自发痛在内的机制过程相对应的脑机制提供了见解。神经元功能、化学和结构的变化(神经可塑性)是神经性疼痛敏感性改变特征产生的基础。神经性疼痛的外周过程包括介质(细胞因子、质子、神经生长因子)的产生、钙通道、钠通道、超极化激活的核苷酸门控离子通道和钾通道的改变、神经末梢的表型转换和发芽以及交感神经系统的参与。N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体的刺激、小胶质细胞、少突胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞的激活、神经生长因子和脑源性神经营养因子产生的增加以及脊髓抑制控制的丧失导致中枢神经元兴奋性过高和神经性疼痛的维持。包括功能成像技术在内的近期进展,在识别与神经系统损伤相关的外周和中枢敏化机制方面,从诊断和治疗角度增加了影响疼痛研究的潜力。可能会确定参与产生药物诱导镇痛的关键脑区。尽管疼痛研究取得了进展,但神经性疼痛的管理仍是一项挑战。虽然有许多治疗方法可用于缓解神经性疼痛,但对于最合适的治疗方法尚无共识。然而,可以根据不同治疗策略的证据水平提出一线、二线和三线药物治疗的建议。已证明对管理神经性疼痛有效的现有疗法包括阿片类药物和曲马多、抗惊厥药、抗抑郁药、局部治疗(利多卡因贴片、辣椒素)和氯胺酮。三环类抗抑郁药通常是缓解神经性疼痛首选的第一种药物(一线药物治疗)。尽管它们在减轻几种神经性疼痛疾病的疼痛方面非常有效,但治疗可能会因其副作用而受到影响(且副作用大于疗效)。对于有心血管疾病、青光眼和尿潴留病史的患者,普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁正成为神经性疼痛的一线治疗药物。此外,这些抗癫痫药物具有良好的安全性,对药物相互作用的担忧最小,且不显示对肝酶的干扰。或者,阿片类药物(羟考酮和美沙酮)和曲马多可以减轻伤害性疼痛和神经性疼痛。尽管有许多治疗方法可用于缓解神经性疼痛,但不超过一半的患者经历临床上有意义的疼痛缓解,几乎总是部分缓解而非完全缓解。此外,患者经常经历令人烦恼的不良反应,因此往往无法耐受治疗。在其余患者中,使用两种或更多种具有不同作用机制的镇痛药的联合疗法也可能提供足够的疼痛缓解。虽然联合治疗是临床实践,可能会带来更大的疼痛缓解,但关于不同镇痛药组合(使用哪种组合、相加或超相加效应的发生、序贯或同时治疗、这些镇痛药单独和联合使用时的不良事件谱)的试验很少。如果药物治疗失败,可以考虑侵入性治疗,如鞘内给药和神经外科刺激技术(脊髓刺激、深部脑刺激和运动皮层刺激)。