Memory Clinic of Fundació ACE, Institut Català de Neurociències Aplicades, Barcelona, Spain.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34(3):769-80. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122002.
The most recent studies about mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are focused on the search for factors that make patients more vulnerable to conversion to dementia, mainly Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of this study was to determine which neuropsychological test performances, including episodic memory profiles, and genetic risk factors (APOE ε4) better predict early conversion to dementia among the four MCI subtypes. Data from 550 MCI patients were analyzed for the purpose of this study and were classified according to Petersen's criteria (2004), and also taking into account the absence (probable MCI) or presence (possible MCI) of comorbidities that could explain cognitive deficits. MCI cases were divided into Probable amnestic (Pr-aMCI) (n = 115), probable non-amnestic (Pr-naMCI) (n = 37), possible amnestic (Pss-aMCI) (n = 234), and possible non-amnestic (Pss-naMCI) (n = 164), single or multiple domain. In the whole MCI sample, regression analysis showed that low performances on Orientation, Verbal Delayed Recall of the Word List Learning test from WMS-III, and Luria's Clock test were associated with conversion to dementia, independently of APOE ε4 allele. Cox proportional-hazards showed that the Probable MCI subtype, presence of storage memory impairment, multiple domain condition, and presence of at least one ε4 allele increased the risk of conversion to dementia. Multivariate survival and Kapplan-Meier analyses showed that the Pr-aMCI with storage memory impairment had the most and closest risk of conversion to dementia. In conclusion, the Pr-aMCI subset of patients had 8.5 times more risk of converting to dementia than the Pss-naMCI group, who displayed the slowest conversion rate to dementia.
最近关于轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 的研究集中在寻找使患者更容易转化为痴呆症的因素上,主要是阿尔茨海默病 (AD)。本研究的目的是确定哪些神经心理学测试表现,包括情景记忆特征,以及遗传风险因素 (APOE ε4) 可以更好地预测四种 MCI 亚型中早期向痴呆的转化。本研究分析了 550 名 MCI 患者的数据,并根据 Petersen 标准 (2004 年) 进行分类,同时考虑到是否存在 (可能的 MCI) 或不存在 (可能的 MCI) 可解释认知缺陷的合并症。MCI 病例分为可能遗忘型 (Pr-aMCI) (n = 115)、可能非遗忘型 (Pr-naMCI) (n = 37)、可能遗忘型 (Pss-aMCI) (n = 234) 和可能非遗忘型 (Pss-naMCI) (n = 164),单或多领域。在整个 MCI 样本中,回归分析显示,定向、WMS-III 单词列表学习测试的言语延迟回忆和 Luria 时钟测试的低表现与痴呆转化独立于 APOE ε4 等位基因有关。Cox 比例风险显示,可能遗忘型 MCI 亚型、存储记忆障碍的存在、多领域状态以及至少存在一个 ε4 等位基因的存在增加了向痴呆转化的风险。多变量生存和 Kapplan-Meier 分析显示,具有存储记忆障碍的 Pr-aMCI 向痴呆转化的风险最高且最接近。总之,与表现出最慢向痴呆转化的 Pss-naMCI 组相比,Pr-aMCI 患者亚组向痴呆转化的风险高 8.5 倍。