Suppr超能文献

新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者自体造血细胞移植序贯与自体造血细胞移植后异基因造血细胞移植的疗效比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of tandem autologous versus autologous followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center/University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Hematol Oncol. 2013 Jan 4;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in understanding of clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of multiple myeloma (MM) and availability of more effective therapies, MM remains incurable. The autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) strategy is based on combining cytoreduction from high-dose (chemo- or chemoradio)-therapy with adoptive immunotherapy. However, conflicting results have been reported when an auto-allo HCT approach is compared to tandem autologous (auto-auto) HCT. A previously published meta-analysis has been reported; however, it suffers from serious methodological flaws.

METHODS

A systematic search identified 152 publications, of which five studies (enrolling 1538 patients) met inclusion criteria. All studies eligible for inclusion utilized biologic randomization.

RESULTS

Assessing response rates by achievement of at least a very good partial response did not differ among the treatment arms [risk ratio (RR) (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87-1.09), p = 0.66]; but complete remission was higher in the auto-allo HCT arm [RR = 1.65 (1.25-2.19), p = 0.0005]. Event-free survival did not differ between auto-allo HCT group versus auto-auto HCT group using per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78 (0.58-1.05)), p = 0.11] or using intention-to-treat analysis [HR = 0.83 (0.60-1.15), p = 0.26]. Overall survival (OS) did not differ among these treatment arms whether analyzed on per-protocol [HR = 0.88 (0.33-2.35), p = 0.79], or by intention-to-treat [HR = 0.80 (0.48-1.32), p = 0.39] analysis. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly worse with auto-allo HCT [RR (95%CI) = 3.55 (2.17-5.80), p < 0.00001].

CONCLUSION

Despite higher complete remission rates, there is no improvement in OS with auto-allo HCT; but this approach results in higher NRM in patients with newly diagnosed MM. At present, totality of evidence suggests that an auto-allo HCT approach for patients with newly diagnosed myeloma should not be offered outside the setting of a clinical trial.

摘要

背景

尽管对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的临床、遗传和分子方面有了更多的了解,并且有了更有效的治疗方法,但 MM 仍然无法治愈。自体-异体(auto-allo)造血细胞移植(HCT)策略基于结合高剂量(化疗或放化疗)的细胞减少与过继免疫疗法。然而,当将自体-异体 HCT 方法与串联自体(auto-auto)HCT 进行比较时,报告了相互矛盾的结果。已经报告了一项先前发表的荟萃分析;然而,它存在严重的方法学缺陷。

方法

系统搜索确定了 152 篇出版物,其中 5 项研究(共纳入 1538 名患者)符合纳入标准。所有符合纳入条件的研究均采用生物随机化。

结果

通过至少达到非常好的部分缓解来评估缓解率,治疗组之间没有差异[风险比(RR)(95%CI)=0.97(0.87-1.09),p=0.66];但自体-异体 HCT 组的完全缓解率更高[RR=1.65(1.25-2.19),p=0.0005]。在使用意向治疗分析时,自体-异体 HCT 组与自体-auto HCT 组之间的无事件生存没有差异[风险比(HR)=0.78(0.58-1.05),p=0.11]或使用方案分析[HR=0.83(0.60-1.15),p=0.26]。这些治疗组之间的总生存(OS)在使用方案分析时没有差异[HR=0.88(0.33-2.35),p=0.79],或使用意向治疗分析时也没有差异[HR=0.80(0.48-1.32),p=0.39]。自体-异体 HCT 的非复发死亡率(NRM)明显更高[RR(95%CI)=3.55(2.17-5.80),p<0.00001]。

结论

尽管完全缓解率较高,但自体-allo HCT 并不能改善 OS;但这种方法会导致新诊断的 MM 患者的 NRM 更高。目前,所有证据表明,新诊断骨髓瘤患者的自体-allo HCT 方法不应在临床试验之外提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffd0/3548722/d8fcb9497740/1756-8722-6-2-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验