Giralt Sergio, Costa Luciano J, Maloney David, Krishnan Amrita, Fei Mingwei, Antin Joseph H, Brunstein Claudio, Geller Nancy, Goodman Stacey, Hari Parameswaran, Logan Brent, Lowsky Robert, Qazilbash Muzaffar H, Sahebi Firoozeh, Somlo George, Rowley Scott, Vogl Dan T, Vesole David H, Pasquini Marcelo, Stadtmauer Edward
Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Apr;26(4):798-804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) may improve long-term multiple myeloma (MM) control through the graft-versus-myeloma effect. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 0102 trial was a biologic assignment trial comparing tandem autologous transplant (auto-auto) versus autologous followed by reduced-intensity allogeneic (auto-allo) transplant in patients with newly diagnosed MM with standard-risk (n = 625) or high-risk (n = 85; β-microglobulin at diagnosis ≥ 4 mg/dL or deletion of chromosome 13 by conventional karyotyping) disease. Although the initial 3-year analysis showed no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between arms in either risk group, we hypothesized that long-term follow-up may better capture the impact of the graft-versus-myeloma effect. Median follow-up of survivors was over 10 years. Among standard-risk patients there was no difference in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], .93 to 1.35; P = .25) or OS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, .82 to 1.28; P = .82). The 6-year PFS was 25% in the auto-auto arm versus 22% in the auto-allo arm (P = .32), and 6-year overall survival (OS) was 60% and 59%, respectively (P = .85). In the high-risk group, although there was no statistically significant difference in PFS (HR, .66; 95% CI, .41 to 1.07; P = .07) and OS (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, .60 to 1.71; P = .96), a reduction in 6-year risk of relapse of 77% versus 47% (P = .005) was reflected in better PFS of 13% versus 31% (P = .05) but similar OS, at 47% versus 51% (P = .69). Allogeneic HCT can lead to long-term disease control in patients with high-risk MM and needs to be explored in the context of modern therapy.
异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)可通过移植物抗骨髓瘤效应改善多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的长期控制。血液和骨髓移植临床试验网络0102试验是一项生物学分配试验,比较了标准风险(n = 625)或高风险(n = 85;诊断时β-微球蛋白≥4 mg/dL或通过传统核型分析显示13号染色体缺失)的新诊断MM患者接受串联自体移植(自体-自体)与自体移植后接受减低强度异基因(自体-异基因)移植的情况。尽管最初的3年分析显示,两个风险组中两组之间的无进展生存期(PFS)无差异,但我们推测长期随访可能能更好地体现移植物抗骨髓瘤效应的影响。幸存者的中位随访时间超过10年。在标准风险患者中,PFS(风险比[HR],1.11;95%置信区间[CI],0.93至1.35;P = 0.25)或总生存期(OS)(HR,1.03;95%CI,0.82至1.28;P = 0.82)均无差异。自体-自体组的6年PFS为25%,自体-异基因组为22%(P = 0.32),6年总生存期(OS)分别为60%和59%(P = 0.85)。在高风险组中,尽管PFS(HR,0.66;95%CI,0.41至1.07;P = 0.07)和OS(HR,1.01;95%CI,0.60至1.71;P = 0.96)无统计学显著差异,但6年复发风险降低,分别为77%和47%(P = 0.005),反映在更好的PFS上,分别为13%和31%(P = 0.05),但OS相似,分别为