Suppr超能文献

能量摄入对消化道癌症风险影响的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 28;18(48):7362-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7362.

Abstract

AIM

To quantitatively assess the relationship between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers in a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Studies were included if they reported relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% CIs of digestive cancers with respect to total energy intake. When RRs were not available in the published article, they were computed from the exposure distributions. Data were extracted independently by two investigators and discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third investigator. We performed fixed-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions to compute the summary RR for highest versus lowest category of energy intake and for per unit energy intake and digestive cancer incidence by giving each study-specific RR a weight that was proportional to its precision.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies consisting of 13 independent cohorts met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 995,577 participants and 5620 incident cases of digestive cancer with an average follow-up of 11.1 years. A significant inverse association was observed between energy intake and the incidence of digestive cancers. The RR of digestive cancers for the highest compared to the lowest caloric intake category was 0.90 (95% CI 0.81-0.98, P < 0.05). The RR for an increment of 239 kcal/d energy intake was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99, P < 0.05) in the fixed model. In subgroup analyses, we noted that energy intake was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99, P < 0.05) and an increased risk of gastric cancer (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31, P < 0.01). There appeared to be no association with esophageal (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.07, P > 0.05) or pancreatic (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.09, P > 0.05) cancer. Associations were also similar in studies from North America and Europe. The RR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.79-1.25, P > 0.05) when considering the six studies conducted in North America and 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.98, P < 0.05) for the five studies from Europe.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that high energy intake may reduce the total digestive cancer incidence and has a preventive effect on colorectal cancer.

摘要

目的

通过荟萃分析队列研究,定量评估能量摄入与消化系统癌症发病之间的关系。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引扩展版和检索文章的参考文献。如果研究报告了总能量摄入与消化系统癌症的相对风险(RR)和相应的 95%置信区间(CI),则将其纳入研究。如果在已发表的文章中没有 RR,则从暴露分布中计算出来。数据由两位研究者独立提取,如果有分歧,由第三位研究者进行讨论。我们进行了固定效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归,以计算最高与最低能量摄入类别以及单位能量摄入与消化系统癌症发病率之间的汇总 RR,为每个研究特有的 RR 赋予与其精度成比例的权重。

结果

共有 19 项研究符合纳入标准,包含 13 个独立队列。这些研究包括 995577 名参与者和 5620 例消化系统癌症发病,平均随访时间为 11.1 年。观察到能量摄入与消化系统癌症的发病呈负相关。与最低热量摄入组相比,最高热量摄入组的消化系统癌症 RR 为 0.90(95%CI 0.81-0.98,P < 0.05)。在固定模型中,每天增加 239 千卡能量摄入的 RR 为 0.97(95%CI 0.95-0.99,P < 0.05)。在亚组分析中,我们注意到能量摄入与结直肠癌(RR 0.90,95%CI 0.81-0.99,P < 0.05)风险降低和胃癌(RR 1.19,95%CI 1.08-1.31,P < 0.01)风险增加相关。与食管癌(RR 0.96,95%CI 0.86-1.07,P > 0.05)或胰腺癌(RR 0.79,95%CI 0.49-1.09,P > 0.05)之间似乎没有关联。北美和欧洲的研究也得出了相似的结果。考虑到来自北美 6 项研究的 RR 为 1.02(95%CI 0.79-1.25,P > 0.05),来自欧洲的 5 项研究的 RR 为 0.87(95%CI 0.77-0.98,P < 0.05)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,高能量摄入可能降低总体消化系统癌症的发病率,并对结直肠癌具有预防作用。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of the effects of energy intake on risk of digestive cancers.
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 28;18(48):7362-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7362.
2
Fish consumption and risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15398-412. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15398.
3
Association between zinc intake and risk of digestive tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun;33(3):415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Coffee drinking and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Mar 7;17(9):1204-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i9.1204.
5
Association between physical activity and digestive-system cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Jan;10(1):4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Coffee consumption and risk of cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
BMC Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;11:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-96.
7
Omega-3 PUFA intake and the risk of digestive system cancers: A meta-analysis of observational studies.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020119.
8
Comprehensive analysis of proton pump inhibitors and risk of digestive tract cancers.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Oct;156:190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
10
Dietary carbohydrate intake, glycaemic index, glycaemic load and digestive system cancers: an updated dose-response meta-analysis.
Br J Nutr. 2019 May;121(10):1081-1096. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519000424. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 26;15:1564575. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1564575. eCollection 2025.
2
The Role of Rab GTPases in the development of genetic and malignant diseases.
Mol Cell Biochem. 2024 Feb;479(2):255-281. doi: 10.1007/s11010-023-04727-x. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
3
Dietary Factors and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Prospective Observational Studies.
Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
4
Dietary Factors Associated with Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Minia, Egypt: Principal Component Analysis.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Feb 26;19(2):449-455. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.449.
5
Association between alcohol consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 14;8(48):84459-84472. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20880. eCollection 2017 Oct 13.
6
Modifiable factors and esophageal cancer: a systematic review of published meta-analyses.
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):37-51. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1375-5. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
8
Association between dairy intake and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 9;9(7):e101728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101728. eCollection 2014.
9
Risk of colonic cancer is not higher in the obese Lep(ob) mouse model compared to lean littermates.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2013 Oct;19(4):867-74. doi: 10.1007/s12253-013-9656-7. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of long-term calorie restriction and endurance exercise on glucose tolerance, insulin action, and adipokine production.
Age (Dordr). 2010 Mar;32(1):97-108. doi: 10.1007/s11357-009-9118-z. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
2
Cancer incidence in Israeli Jewish survivors of World War II.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Nov 4;101(21):1489-500. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp327. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
3
Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys.
Science. 2009 Jul 10;325(5937):201-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1173635.
4
Biomarker-calibrated energy and protein consumption and increased cancer risk among postmenopausal women.
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 15;169(8):977-89. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp008. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
5
Energy restriction for breast cancer prevention.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2009;181:97-111. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69297-3_11.
6
Cancer mortality in women and men who survived the siege of Leningrad (1941-1944).
Int J Cancer. 2009 Mar 15;124(6):1416-21. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24093.
7
Effects of adiponectin on breast cancer cell growth and signaling.
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jan 29;98(2):370-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604166. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
8
Chronic caloric restriction induces forestomach hypertrophy with enhanced ghrelin levels during aging.
Peptides. 2007 Oct;28(10):1931-6. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.07.030. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
9
Energy balance and carcinogenesis: underlying pathways and targets for intervention.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2007 Aug;7(5):484-91. doi: 10.2174/156800907781386623.
10
Aging, adiposity, and calorie restriction.
JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):986-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.9.986.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验