TransAnalytics, LLC; 336 West Broad Street, Quakertown, PA 18951, United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Dec;61:212-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
This paper advocates policy change in three key areas: infrastructure, driver licensing, and access to private resources for transportation alternatives. Policy makers are encouraged to plan for the transportation future of our aging society by prioritizing public expenditures for roads and highways according to design and engineering practices already proven to assist older drivers and pedestrians. By adopting minimum, evidence-based requirements for visual, mental and physical capability for licensure and uniformly applying them at all ages, across all states, policy makers can improve the safety of older drivers without unfairly restricting their mobility-and need not increase the regulatory burden in doing so. By reviewing and replicating already successful state policies that either create incentives or remove barriers to the use of private resources for non-profit, senior transportation, policy makers can help communities access the labor and capital, as well as manage the risks of market-oriented, non-profit mobility solutions.
基础设施、驾驶执照和获取私人交通资源的途径。政策制定者应根据已经证明有助于老年驾驶员和行人的设计和工程实践,优先为道路和高速公路的公共支出进行规划,以规划我们老龄化社会的交通未来。通过对视觉、精神和身体能力的最低、基于证据的许可要求进行采纳,并在所有年龄段、所有州统一应用这些要求,政策制定者可以在不不公平地限制老年人机动性的情况下提高老年驾驶员的安全性——而且这样做不必增加监管负担。通过审查和复制已经成功的州政策,这些政策为非营利性老年人交通使用私人资源创造激励或消除障碍,政策制定者可以帮助社区获得劳动力和资本,并管理面向市场的非营利性移动解决方案的风险。