School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J1P3.
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Sep 18;12:e190. doi: 10.5334/ijic.843. Print 2012 Jul-Sep.
Despite over two decades of international experience and research on health systems integration, integrated care has not developed widely. We hypothesized that part of the problem may lie in how we conceptualize the integration process and the complex systems within which integrated care is enacted. This study aims to contribute to discourse regarding the relevance and utility of a complex-adaptive systems (CAS) perspective on integrated care.
In the Canadian province of Ontario, government mandated the development of fourteen Local Health Integration Networks in 2006. Against the backdrop of these efforts to integrate care, we collected focus group data from a diverse sample of healthcare professionals in the Greater Toronto Area using convenience and snowball sampling. A semi-structured interview guide was used to elicit participant views and experiences of health systems integration. We use a CAS framework to describe and analyze the data, and to assess the theoretical fit of a CAS perspective with the dominant themes in participant responses.
Our findings indicate that integration is challenged by system complexity, weak ties and poor alignment among professionals and organizations, a lack of funding incentives to support collaborative work, and a bureaucratic environment based on a command and control approach to management. Using a CAS framework, we identified several characteristics of CAS in our data, including diverse, interdependent and semi-autonomous actors; embedded co-evolutionary systems; emergent behaviours and non-linearity; and self-organizing capacity.
One possible explanation for the lack of systems change towards integration is that we have failed to treat the healthcare system as complex-adaptive. The data suggest that future integration initiatives must be anchored in a CAS perspective, and focus on building the system's capacity to self-organize. We conclude that integrating care requires policies and management practices that promote system awareness, relationship-building and information-sharing, and that recognize change as an evolving learning process rather than a series of programmatic steps.
尽管在国际上已经有二十多年的健康系统整合经验和研究,但整合式医疗的发展仍不尽如人意。我们推测,部分问题可能源于我们对整合过程的概念化方式,以及整合式医疗所实施的复杂系统。本研究旨在为有关综合护理的复杂适应系统(CAS)视角的相关性和实用性提供一些参考。
在加拿大安大略省,政府于 2006 年要求建立 14 个地方卫生整合网络。在这些整合医疗服务的努力的背景下,我们使用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样方法,从大多伦多地区的不同医疗保健专业人员中收集了焦点小组数据。使用半结构化访谈指南来引出参与者对医疗系统整合的看法和经验。我们使用 CAS 框架来描述和分析数据,并评估 CAS 视角与参与者回应中的主要主题的理论契合度。
我们的研究结果表明,系统的复杂性、专业人员和组织之间的弱联系和不良协调、缺乏支持协作工作的资金激励、以及基于指挥和控制方法的官僚环境,都对整合造成了挑战。通过使用 CAS 框架,我们在数据中发现了几个 CAS 的特征,包括多样化、相互依存和半自主的参与者;嵌入式协同进化系统;涌现的行为和非线性;以及自我组织的能力。
医疗系统向整合方向转变缺乏动力的一个可能解释是,我们未能将医疗保健系统视为复杂适应系统。数据表明,未来的整合计划必须基于 CAS 视角,并注重构建系统的自我组织能力。我们得出的结论是,整合医疗服务需要政策和管理实践来促进系统意识、关系建设和信息共享,并认识到变革是一个不断发展的学习过程,而不是一系列的项目步骤。