University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine/Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Aug;36(8):2359-65. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1463. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Pulse pressure (PP), a strong predictor of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes, is a composite measure affected by several hemodynamic factors. Little is known about the hemodynamic determinants of central PP in type 2 diabetes or whether abnormalities in central pulsatile hemodynamics are already present in individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). In a population-based study, we aimed to compare central PP and its hemodynamic determinants among adults with normal fasting glucose (n = 1654), IFG (n = 240), and type 2 diabetes (n = 33).
We measured carotid pressure, left ventricular outflow, aortic root diameter, carotid artery flow, and distension in order to measure various structural and hemodynamic arterial parameters.
IFG was associated with a greater mean arterial pressure (MAP) but was not associated with intrinsic aortic stiffening or abnormal aortic pulsatile indices after adjustment for MAP. After adjustment for age, sex, and MAP, type 2 diabetes was associated with a higher aortic root characteristic impedance (Zc), aortic root elastance-thickness product (Eh), and aortic root pulse wave velocity (but not aortic root diameter), a greater carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, and lower total arterial compliance and wave reflection magnitude. Carotid size, Zc, distensibility, or Eh did not significantly differ between the groups.
Type 2 diabetes, but not IFG, is associated with greater large artery stiffness, without abnormalities in aortic root diameter or carotid stiffness. Subjects with type 2 diabetes demonstrate a decreased reflection magnitude, which may indicate an increased penetration of pulsatile energy to distal vascular beds.
脉压(PP)是 2 型糖尿病心血管事件的强有力预测因子,是受多种血液动力学因素影响的综合指标。关于 2 型糖尿病中心脉压的血液动力学决定因素,以及空腹血糖受损(IFG)个体中是否存在中心搏动性血液动力学异常,知之甚少。在一项基于人群的研究中,我们旨在比较正常空腹血糖(n = 1654)、IFG(n = 240)和 2 型糖尿病(n = 33)成人之间的中心 PP 及其血液动力学决定因素。
我们测量了颈动脉压力、左心室射流、主动脉根部直径、颈动脉血流和扩张,以测量各种结构和血液动力学动脉参数。
IFG 与平均动脉压(MAP)升高相关,但在调整 MAP 后,与内在主动脉僵硬度或异常主动脉搏动指数无关。在调整年龄、性别和 MAP 后,2 型糖尿病与更高的主动脉根部特征阻抗(Zc)、主动脉根部弹性-厚度乘积(Eh)和主动脉根部脉搏波速度(但不包括主动脉根部直径)、更高的颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度以及更低的总动脉顺应性和波反射幅度相关。颈动脉大小、Zc、可扩张性或 Eh 在各组之间没有显著差异。
与 IFG 不同,2 型糖尿病与更大的大动脉僵硬相关,而主动脉根部直径或颈动脉僵硬无异常。2 型糖尿病患者的反射幅度降低,这可能表明脉动能量向远端血管床的穿透增加。