Suppr超能文献

评估一种新的无创设备在急诊科患者中确定血红蛋白水平的应用。

Evaluation of a new nonnvasive device in determining hemoglobin levels in emergency department patients.

机构信息

Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Tacoma, Washington.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2013 May;14(3):283-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6733.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Masimo Radical-7 Pulse CO-Oximeter is a medical device recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that performs noninvasive oximetry and estimated venous or arterial hemoglobin measurements. A portable, noninvasive device that rapidly measures hemoglobin concentration could be useful in both austere and modern hospital settings. The objective of this study is to determine the degree of variation between the device's estimated hemoglobin measurement and the actual venous hemoglobin concentration in undifferentiated emergency department (ED) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adult patients presenting to the ED. The subjects consisted of a convenience sample of adult ED patients who required a complete blood count as part of their care in the ED. A simultaneous probe hemoglobin was obtained and recorded.

RESULTS

Bias between probe and laboratory hemoglobin measurements was -0.5 (95% confidence interval, - 0.8 to -0.1) but this was not statistically significant from 0 (t 0.05,124 = 0.20, P > 0.5). The limits of agreement were -4.7 and 3.8, beyond the clinically relevant standard of equivalency of ± 1 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that noninvasive hemoglobin determination is not sufficiently accurate for emergency department use.

摘要

简介

Masimo Radical-7 脉搏 CO- 血氧仪是一种最近获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的医疗设备,可进行非侵入性血氧测量和估计静脉或动脉血红蛋白测量。一种便携式、非侵入性的快速测量血红蛋白浓度的设备,在简陋和现代化的医院环境中都可能有用。本研究的目的是确定该设备估计的血红蛋白测量值与未经区分的急诊科(ED)患者实际静脉血红蛋白浓度之间的差异程度。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究,纳入了成年 ED 患者。研究对象为成年 ED 患者的便利样本,这些患者在 ED 护理中需要进行全血细胞计数。同时获得并记录探头血红蛋白值。

结果

探头和实验室血红蛋白测量值之间的偏差为-0.5(95%置信区间,-0.8 至-0.1),但与 0 无统计学差异(t 0.05,124 = 0.20,P > 0.5)。临床等效性标准为±1 g/dL 时,一致性界限为-4.7 和 3.8。

结论

这些数据表明,非侵入性血红蛋白测定在急诊科使用不够准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6de1/3656712/bc4bba331bfc/i1936-900X-14-3-283-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验