Department of Social Dentistry and Gnathological Rehabilitation, National Institute for Health, Migrant and Poverty, Rome, Italy.
Implant Dent. 2013 Aug;22(4):344-50. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182943062.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible leakage of 3 species of bacteria (Streptococcus sanguinis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Actinomyces odontolyticus) and of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata in osseointegrated implants with different implant-abutment interface (IAI) geometry.
Two groups of implants, (1) implant-abutment unit with a tube-in-tube interface and (2) implant-abutment unit with a flat-to-flat interface closed with different torque values, were compared in the study. In the first phase, the implants were assembled and cultured in vitro for 7 days. The implants and abutments were disconnected and samples were taken and cultured. In the second phase, the internal part of each implant was inoculated with 0.1 µL of microbial broth and then connected to the respective abutments. Afterward, medium samples were taken and cultured.
The group 1 implants were more resistant to colonization than those of group 2 (P < 0.05). The intragroup difference was significant between the implant-abutment units assembled with the recommended torque values and those with lower torque values (P < 0.01) for both the groups.
IAI geometry influences both bacterial and yeast colonization inside the implants as well as the torque value used to connect abutments to implants.
本研究旨在评估 3 种细菌(血链球菌、核梭杆菌和龋齿放线菌)和白色念珠菌、光滑念珠菌是否会从具有不同种植体-基台界面(IAI)几何形状的骨整合种植体中泄漏。
本研究比较了两组种植体,(1)具有管中管界面的种植体-基台单元和(2)采用不同扭矩值封闭的具有平面对平面界面的种植体-基台单元。在第一阶段,将种植体进行体外组装和培养 7 天。断开种植体和基台,采集样本并进行培养。在第二阶段,将每个种植体的内部部分用 0.1µL 微生物肉汤接种,然后连接到各自的基台上。之后,采集培养基样本并进行培养。
第 1 组种植体比第 2 组更能抵抗定植(P<0.05)。对于两组,推荐扭矩值组装的种植体-基台单元与较低扭矩值组装的种植体-基台单元之间存在显著的组内差异(P<0.01)。
IAI 几何形状不仅影响种植体内部的细菌和酵母定植,还影响连接基台和种植体的扭矩值。