Smith Nicole A, Turkyilmaz Ilser
Resident, United States Air Force, Joint Base San Antonio, Lackland AFB, San Antonio, Texas.
Assistant Professor, Director, Dental School Implant Clinic, Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
When evaluating long-term implant success, clinicians have always been concerned with the gap at the implant-abutment junction, where bacteria can accumulate and cause marginal bone loss. However, little information regarding bacterial leakage at the implant-abutment junction, or microgap, is available.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate sealing at 2 different implant-abutment interfaces under different screw torque values.
Twenty sterile zirconia abutments and 20 sterile titanium abutments were screwed into 40 sterile implants and placed in test tubes. The ability of a bacterial mixture of Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum to leak through an implant-titanium abutment seal under 20 and 35 Ncm torque values and an implant-zirconia abutment seal under 20 and 35 Ncm torque values was evaluated daily until leakage was noted. Once a unit demonstrated leakage, a specimen was plated. After 4 days, the number of colonies on each plate was counted with an electronic colony counter. Plating was used to verify whether or not bacterial leakage occurred and when leakage first occurred. The implant-abutment units were removed and rinsed with phosphate buffered saline solution and evaluated with a stereomicroscope. The marginal gap between the implant and the abutment was measured and correlated with the amount of bacterial leakage. The data were analyzed with ANOVA.
Bacterial leakage was noted in all specimens, regardless of material or screw torque value. With titanium abutments, changing the screw torque value from 20 to 35 Ncm did not significantly affect the amount of bacterial leakage. However, with zirconia abutments, changing the screw torque value from 20 to 35 Ncm was statistically significant (P<.017). Overall, the marginal gap noted was larger at the zirconia-abutment interface (5.25 ±1.99 μm) than the titanium-abutment interface (12.38 ±3.73 μm), irrespective of the screw torque value. Stereomicroscopy revealed a nonuniform marginal gap in all specimens.
The results of this study showed that, over time, bacteria will leak through the implant-abutment microgap at the implant-abutment interface. Implants with a titanium abutment demonstrate a smaller microgap than implants with a zirconia abutment. Tightening the zirconia abutment screw from 20 to 35 Ncm decreases the size of the microgap, which suggests a more intimate fit between the implant and the abutment.
在评估长期种植体成功率时,临床医生一直关注种植体-基台连接处的间隙,细菌可在此处积聚并导致边缘骨吸收。然而,关于种植体-基台连接处或微间隙处细菌渗漏的信息却很少。
本研究的目的是评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下两种不同种植体-基台界面的密封情况。
将20个无菌氧化锆基台和20个无菌钛基台拧入40个无菌种植体中,并放入试管中。每天评估中间普氏菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和具核梭杆菌的细菌混合物在20 Ncm和35 Ncm扭矩值下通过种植体-钛基台密封以及在20 Ncm和35 Ncm扭矩值下通过种植体-氧化锆基台密封渗漏的能力,直至发现渗漏。一旦某个单元出现渗漏,就进行样本接种。4天后,用电子菌落计数器对每个平板上的菌落数进行计数。接种用于验证是否发生细菌渗漏以及渗漏首次发生的时间。取出种植体-基台单元,用磷酸盐缓冲盐溶液冲洗,并用体视显微镜进行评估。测量种植体与基台之间的边缘间隙,并将其与细菌渗漏量相关联。数据采用方差分析进行分析。
所有样本均出现细菌渗漏,无论材料或螺钉扭矩值如何。对于钛基台,将螺钉扭矩值从20 Ncm更改为35 Ncm对细菌渗漏量没有显著影响。然而,对于氧化锆基台,将螺钉扭矩值从20 Ncm更改为35 Ncm具有统计学意义(P<0.017)。总体而言,无论螺钉扭矩值如何,氧化锆基台界面处的边缘间隙(5.25±1.99μm)比钛基台界面处的(12.38±3.73μm)更大。体视显微镜显示所有样本的边缘间隙不均匀。
本研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,细菌会通过种植体-基台界面处的种植体-基台微间隙渗漏。与氧化锆基台种植体相比,钛基台种植体的微间隙更小。将氧化锆基台螺钉从20 Ncm拧紧至35 Ncm可减小微间隙的大小,这表明种植体与基台之间的贴合更紧密。