Suppr超能文献

地塞米松减轻癌症相关疲劳:晚期癌症患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Reduction of cancer-related fatigue with dexamethasone: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced cancer.

机构信息

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;31(25):3076-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4661. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common symptom in patients with advanced cancer. The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the effect of dexamethasone and placebo on CRF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer with ≥ three CRF-related symptoms (ie, fatigue, pain, nausea, loss of appetite, depression, anxiety, or sleep disturbance) ≥ 4 of 10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to either dexamethasone 4 mg or placebo orally twice per day for 14 days. The primary end point was change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness-Fatigue (FACIT-F) subscale from baseline to day 15. Secondary outcomes included anorexia, anxiety, depression, and symptom distress scores.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were evaluable (dexamethasone, 43; placebo, 41). Mean (± standard deviation) improvement in the FACIT-F subscale at day 15 was significantly higher in the dexamethasone than in the placebo group (9 [± 10.3] v 3.1 [± 9.59]; P = .008). The improvement in FACIT-F total quality-of-life scores was also significantly better for the dexamethasone group at day 15 (P = .03). The mean differences in the ESAS physical distress scores at day 15 were significantly better for the dexamethasone group (P = .013, respectively). No differences were observed for ESAS overall symptom distress (P = .22) or psychological distress score (P = .76). Frequency of adverse effects was not significantly different between groups (41 of 62 v 44 of 58; P = .14).

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone is more effective than placebo in improving CRF and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.

摘要

目的

癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是晚期癌症患者最常见的症状。本前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的主要目的是比较地塞米松和安慰剂对 CRF 的影响。

方法

符合条件的患者为患有晚期癌症且至少有三个 CRF 相关症状(即疲劳、疼痛、恶心、食欲不振、抑郁、焦虑或睡眠障碍),且 Edmonton 症状评估量表(ESAS)得分为≥ 4 分(总分 10 分)。患者被随机分配至地塞米松 4mg 或安慰剂,每日口服 2 次,共 14 天。主要终点是从基线到第 15 天的慢性疾病疲劳功能评估(FACIT-F)子量表的变化。次要结局包括厌食、焦虑、抑郁和症状困扰评分。

结果

共有 84 例患者可评估(地塞米松组 43 例,安慰剂组 41 例)。第 15 天时地塞米松组的 FACIT-F 子量表的平均(±标准差)改善明显高于安慰剂组(9 [± 10.3]比 3.1 [± 9.59];P =.008)。第 15 天时地塞米松组的 FACIT-F 总生活质量评分的改善也明显更好(P =.03)。第 15 天时地塞米松组的 ESAS 身体困扰评分的平均差异也明显更好(P =.013)。然而,ESAS 整体症状困扰(P =.22)或心理困扰评分(P =.76)没有观察到差异。两组之间不良反应的发生率无显著差异(62 例中有 41 例,58 例中有 44 例;P =.14)。

结论

地塞米松在改善晚期癌症患者的 CRF 和生活质量方面比安慰剂更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验