Suppr超能文献

人工神经网络评估青少年特发性脊柱侧凸:与 Lenke 分类的比较。

Artificial neural networks assessing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison with Lenke classification.

机构信息

Research Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1C5; Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2A 3C8.

出版信息

Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.449. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Variability in classifying and selecting levels of fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been repeatedly documented. Several computer algorithms have been used to classify AIS based on the geometrical features, but none have attempted to analyze its treatment patterns.

PURPOSE

To use self-organizing maps (SOM), a kind of artificial neural networks, to reliably classify AIS cases from a large database. To analyze surgeon's treatment pattern in selecting curve regions to fuse in AIS using Lenke classification and SOM.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a technical concept article on the possibility and benefits of using neural networks to classify AIS and a retrospective analysis of AIS curve regions selected for fusion.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 1,776 patients surgically treated for AIS were prospectively enrolled in a multicentric database. Cobb angles were measured on AIS patient spine radiographies, and patients were classified according to Lenke classification.

OUTCOME MEASURES

For each patient in the database, surgical approach and levels of fusion selected by the treating surgeon were recorded.

METHODS

A Kohonen SOM was generated using 1,776 surgically treated AIS cases. The quality of the SOM was tested using topological error. Percentages of prediction of fusion based on Lenke classification for each patient in the database and for each node in the SOM were calculated. Lenke curve types, treatment pattern, and kappa statistics for agreement between fusion realized and fusion recommended by Lenke classification were plotted on each node of the map.

RESULTS

The topographic error for the SOM generated was 0.02, which demonstrates high accuracy. The SOM differentiates clear clusters of curve type nodes on the map. The SOM also shows epicenters for main thoracic, double thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve types and transition zones between clusters. When cases are taken individually, Lenke classification predicted curve regions fused by the surgeon in 46% of cases. When those cases are reorganized by the SOM into nodes, Lenke classification predicted the curve regions to fuse in 82% of the nodes. Agreement with Lenke classification principles was high in epicenters for curve types 1, 2, and 5, moderate in cluster for curve types 3, 4, and 6, and low in transition zones between curve types.

CONCLUSIONS

An AIS SOM with high accuracy was successfully generated. Lenke classification principles are followed in 46% of the cases but in 82% of the nodes on the SOM. The SOM highlights the tendency of surgeons to follow Lenke classification principles for similar curves on the SOM. Self-organizing map classification of AIS could be valuable to surgeons because it bypasses the limitations imposed by rigid classification such as cutoff values on Cobb angle to define curve types. It can extract similar cases from large databases to analyze and guide treatment.

摘要

背景

在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中,对融合水平的分类和选择存在很大的差异,这一点已经被反复记录。已经有几种计算机算法被用于根据几何特征对 AIS 进行分类,但没有一种算法试图分析其治疗模式。

目的

使用自组织映射(SOM),一种人工神经网络,对大型数据库中的 AIS 病例进行可靠分类。使用 Lenke 分类和 SOM 分析外科医生在选择 AIS 融合曲线区域时的治疗模式。

研究设计

这是一篇关于使用神经网络对 AIS 进行分类的可能性和益处的技术概念文章,以及对 AIS 曲线区域选择进行融合的回顾性分析。

患者样本

共有 1776 名接受 AIS 手术治疗的患者前瞻性地纳入一个多中心数据库。在 AIS 患者的脊柱 X 光片上测量 Cobb 角,并根据 Lenke 分类对患者进行分类。

研究结果

数据库中的每个患者,治疗医生选择的手术方法和融合水平都被记录下来。使用 1776 例接受手术治疗的 AIS 病例生成了一个科恩恩 SOM。使用拓扑误差测试 SOM 的质量。计算数据库中每个患者和 SOM 中每个节点的基于 Lenke 分类的融合预测百分比。在地图的每个节点上绘制 Lenke 曲线类型、治疗模式以及融合实现与 Lenke 分类推荐之间的kappa 统计数据。

结论

成功生成了一个具有高精度的 AIS SOM。Lenke 分类原则在 46%的病例中得到了遵循,但在 SOM 中的 82%的节点中得到了遵循。在曲线类型 1、2 和 5 的中心区域,遵循 Lenke 分类原则的程度较高,在曲线类型 3、4 和 6 的集群中,遵循 Lenke 分类原则的程度中等,在曲线类型之间的过渡区域,遵循 Lenke 分类原则的程度较低。AIS 的 SOM 分类对外科医生可能很有价值,因为它绕过了 Cobb 角等刚性分类方法对曲线类型定义的限制。它可以从大型数据库中提取相似的病例进行分析和指导治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验