Suppr超能文献

老年期重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:度洛西汀与安慰剂比较。

Acute and long-term treatment of late-life major depressive disorder: duloxetine versus placebo.

机构信息

Lilly USA, LLC, Indianapolis, IN.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;22(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of duloxetine with placebo on depression in elderly patients with major depressive disorder.

DESIGN

Multicenter, 24-week (12-week short-term and 12-week continuation), randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

SETTING

United States, France, Mexico, Puerto Rico.

PARTICIPANTS

Age 65 years or more with major depressive disorder diagnosis (one or more previous episode); Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥20; Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≥20.

INTERVENTION

Duloxetine 60 or 120 mg/day or placebo; placebo rescue possible.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary-Maier subscale of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) at week 12. Secondary-Geriatric Depression Scale, HAMD-17 total score, cognitive measures, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for pain, Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale, Patient Global Impression of Improvement in acute phase and acute plus continuation phase of treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, duloxetine did not show significantly greater improvement from baseline on Maier subscale at 12 weeks, but did show significantly greater improvement at weeks 4, 8, 16, and 20. Similar patterns for Geriatric Depression Scale and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale emerged, with significance also seen at week 24. There was a significant treatment effect for all BPI items and 4 of 6 NRS pain measures in the acute phase, most BPI items and half of the NRS measures in the continuation phase. More duloxetine-treated patients completed the study (63% versus 55%). A significantly higher percentage of duloxetine-treated patients versus placebo discontinued due to adverse event (15.3% versus 5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the antidepressant efficacy of duloxetine was not confirmed by the primary outcome, several secondary measures at multiple time points suggested efficacy. Duloxetine had significant and meaningful beneficial effects on pain.

摘要

目的

比较度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗老年重性抑郁障碍患者抑郁的疗效。

设计

多中心、24 周(12 周短期和 12 周维持)、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验。

地点

美国、法国、墨西哥、波多黎各。

参与者

年龄 65 岁或以上,有重性抑郁障碍诊断(有一次或多次既往发作);简易精神状态检查量表评分≥20;蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表总分≥20。

干预措施

度洛西汀 60 或 120mg/天或安慰剂;可使用安慰剂解救。

测量

主要指标——汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD-17)的 17 项迈尔亚伯量表在第 12 周的得分。次要指标——老年抑郁量表、HAMD-17 总分、认知测量、简明疼痛量表(BPI)、疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)、临床总体印象严重度量表、患者在急性期和急性加维持期治疗中的改善整体印象。

结果

与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀在第 12 周时在迈尔亚伯量表上的改善没有显著大于基线,但在第 4、8、16 和 20 周时的改善显著。在老年抑郁量表和临床总体印象严重度量表上也出现了类似的模式,在第 24 周时也具有统计学意义。在急性期,所有 BPI 项目和 6 个 NRS 疼痛测量中的 4 个有显著的治疗效果,在维持期,BPI 大部分项目和 NRS 测量的一半有显著的治疗效果。更多的度洛西汀治疗患者完成了研究(63%比 55%)。度洛西汀治疗患者因不良反应而停药的比例明显高于安慰剂(15.3%比 5.8%)。

结论

虽然度洛西汀的抗抑郁疗效没有通过主要结局得到证实,但多个时间点的一些次要指标提示了疗效。度洛西汀对疼痛有显著和有意义的有益影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验