Suppr超能文献

在胃肠道转运过程中,曲马多两种作用机制之间缺乏协同相互作用。

Lack of synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in gastrointestinal transit.

作者信息

Cowan A, Raffa R B, Tallarida C S, Tallarida R J, Christoph T, Schröder W, Tzschentke T M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine and Center for Substance Abuse Research, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2014 Sep;18(8):1148-56. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.00461.x. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A multi-mechanistic approach offers potential enhancement of analgesic efficacy, but therapeutic gain could be offset by an increase in adverse events. The centrally acting analgesic tapentadol [(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-dimethylamino-1-ethyl-2-methyl-propyl)-phenol hydrochloride] combines μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonism and neuronal noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (NRI), both of which contribute to its analgesic effects. Previously, isobolographic analysis of occupation-effect data and a theoretically equivalent methodology determining interactions from the effect scale demonstrated pronounced synergistic interaction between the two mechanisms of action of tapentadol in two models of antinociception (low-intensity tail-flick and spinal nerve ligation). The present study investigated the nature of interaction of the two mechanisms on a surrogate measure for gastrointestinal adverse effect (inhibition of gastrointestinal transit).

METHODS

Dose-response curves were generated in rats for tapentadol alone or in combination with the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, or the α2 -adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, to reveal the effect of tapentadol based upon MOR agonism, NRI, and combined mechanisms.

RESULTS

The dose-effect curve of tapentadol was shifted to the right by both antagonists, thereby providing data to distinguish between MOR agonism and NRI. Analysis revealed a simple additive interaction between the two mechanisms on this endpoint, in contrast to the synergistic interaction previously demonstrated for antinociception.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe this is the first published evaluation of mechanistic interaction for a surrogate measure of adverse effect of a single compound with two mechanisms of action, and the results suggest that there is a greater separation between the analgesic and gastrointestinal effects of tapentadol than expected based upon its analgesic efficacy.

摘要

背景

多机制方法可能会提高镇痛效果,但治疗效果的提升可能会被不良事件的增加所抵消。中枢性镇痛药曲马多[(-)-(1R,2R)-3-(3-二甲基氨基-1-乙基-2-甲基丙基)-苯酚盐酸盐]兼具μ-阿片受体(MOR)激动作用和神经元去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制(NRI)作用,这两种作用均有助于其镇痛效果。此前,对占有率-效应数据进行的等效应线分析以及从效应尺度确定相互作用的理论等效方法表明,在两种抗伤害感受模型(低强度甩尾和脊神经结扎)中,曲马多的两种作用机制之间存在明显的协同相互作用。本研究基于胃肠道不良反应的替代指标(胃肠运输抑制),探究了这两种机制相互作用的性质。

方法

在大鼠中生成曲马多单独给药或与阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛酮或α2-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂育亨宾联合给药的剂量-反应曲线,以揭示基于MOR激动、NRI及联合机制的曲马多效应。

结果

两种拮抗剂均使曲马多的剂量-效应曲线右移,从而提供了区分MOR激动和NRI的数据。分析显示,在该终点上,两种机制之间存在简单的相加相互作用,这与之前在抗伤害感受方面所证明的协同相互作用形成对比。

结论

我们认为,这是首次发表的针对具有两种作用机制的单一化合物不良反应替代指标的机制相互作用评估,结果表明,曲马多的镇痛作用和胃肠道作用之间的分离程度比基于其镇痛效果预期的更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验