Sun Yanjun, Nguyen Amanda Q, Nguyen Joseph P, Le Luc, Saur Dieter, Choi Jiwon, Callaway Edward M, Xu Xiangmin
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-1275, USA.
II. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Cell Rep. 2014 Apr 10;7(1):269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
We developed and applied a Cre-dependent, genetically modified rabies-based tracing system to map direct synaptic connections to specific CA1 neuron types in the mouse hippocampus. We found common inputs to excitatory and inhibitory CA1 neurons from CA3, CA2, the entorhinal cortex (EC), the medial septum (MS), and, unexpectedly, the subiculum. Excitatory CA1 neurons receive inputs from both cholinergic and GABAergic MS neurons, whereas inhibitory neurons receive a great majority of inputs from GABAergic MS neurons. Both cell types also receive weaker input from glutamatergic MS neurons. Comparisons of inputs to CA1 PV+ interneurons versus SOM+ interneurons showed similar strengths of input from the subiculum, but PV+ interneurons received much stronger input than SOM+ neurons from CA3, the EC, and the MS. Thus, rabies tracing identifies hippocampal circuit connections and maps how the different input sources to CA1 are distributed with different strengths on each of its constituent cell types.
我们开发并应用了一种基于狂犬病病毒的、依赖于Cre的基因改造追踪系统,以绘制小鼠海马体中与特定CA1神经元类型的直接突触连接图谱。我们发现,来自CA3、CA2、内嗅皮质(EC)、内侧隔核(MS)以及出乎意料的下托,都有共同的输入到兴奋性和抑制性CA1神经元。兴奋性CA1神经元从胆碱能和GABA能MS神经元接收输入,而抑制性神经元则大部分输入来自GABA能MS神经元。两种细胞类型也从谷氨酸能MS神经元接收较弱的输入。对CA1 PV+中间神经元与SOM+中间神经元输入的比较显示,来自下托的输入强度相似,但PV+中间神经元从CA3、EC和MS接收的输入比SOM+神经元强得多。因此,狂犬病病毒追踪识别了海马体回路连接,并绘制了不同输入源如何以不同强度分布在CA1的每种组成细胞类型上。